PMID- 29975709 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20181226 LR - 20230926 IS - 1932-6203 (Electronic) IS - 1932-6203 (Linking) VI - 13 IP - 7 DP - 2018 TI - A qualitative study exploring patient motivations for screening for lung cancer. PG - e0196758 LID - 10.1371/journal.pone.0196758 [doi] LID - e0196758 AB - BACKGROUND: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest for lung cancer screening of heavy smokers was given a 'B' rating by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) in 2013, and gained widespread insurance coverage in the U.S. in 2015. Lung cancer screening has since had low uptake. However, for those that do choose to screen, little is known about patient motivations for completing screening in real-world practice. OBJECTIVE: To explore the motivations for screening-eligible patients to screen for lung cancer. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 LDCT screen-completed men and women who were members of an integrated mixed-model healthcare system in Washington State. From June to September 2015, participants were recruited and individual interviews performed about motivations to screen for lung cancer. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed and analyzed using inductive content analysis by three investigators. RESULTS: Four primary themes emerged as motivations for completing LDCT lung cancer screening: 1) trust in the referring clinician; 2) early-detection benefit; 3) low or limited harm perception; and 4) friends or family with advanced cancer. CONCLUSION: Participants in our study were primarily motivated to screen for lung cancer based on perceived benefit of early-detection, absence of safety concerns, and personal relationships. Our findings provide new insights about patient motivations to screen, and can potentially be used to improve lung cancer screening uptake and shared decision-making processes. FAU - Roth, Joshua A AU - Roth JA AUID- ORCID: 0000-0001-6621-8342 AD - Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America. AD - Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America. FAU - Carter-Harris, Lisa AU - Carter-Harris L AD - School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America. FAU - Brandzel, Susan AU - Brandzel S AD - Health Stories Project Insights, Seattle, Washington, United States of America. FAU - Buist, Diana S M AU - Buist DSM AD - Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America. FAU - Wernli, Karen J AU - Wernli KJ AD - Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America. LA - eng GR - K12 HS022982/HS/AHRQ HHS/United States PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. DEP - 20180705 PL - United States TA - PLoS One JT - PloS one JID - 101285081 SB - IM MH - Aged MH - Decision Making MH - Early Detection of Cancer/*methods MH - Female MH - *Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice MH - Health Personnel/psychology MH - Humans MH - Lung Neoplasms/*diagnosis/*diagnostic imaging/pathology MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Risk Factors MH - Tomography, X-Ray Computed PMC - PMC6033377 COIS- The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. EDAT- 2018/07/06 06:00 MHDA- 2018/12/27 06:00 PMCR- 2018/07/05 CRDT- 2018/07/06 06:00 PHST- 2017/10/13 00:00 [received] PHST- 2018/04/19 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2018/07/06 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2018/07/06 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2018/12/27 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2018/07/05 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - PONE-D-17-36854 [pii] AID - 10.1371/journal.pone.0196758 [doi] PST - epublish SO - PLoS One. 2018 Jul 5;13(7):e0196758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196758. eCollection 2018.