PMID- 30316015 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20190131 LR - 20190131 IS - 1532-2661 (Electronic) IS - 0034-5288 (Linking) VI - 121 DP - 2018 Dec TI - Comparison of six commercial ELISAs for the detection of antibodies against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in field serum samples. PG - 40-45 LID - S0034-5288(18)31337-7 [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.10.005 [doi] AB - Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is one of the most common infectious diseases of swine globally. Since the course of PRRS virus (PRRSV) infection is subclinical, laboratory diagnosis is necessary to detect the virus or specific antibodies. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of IDEXX PRRS X3 Ab Test (IDEXX, USA), Civtest Suis E/S (Hipra, Spain), INgezim PRRS 2.0 (Ingenasa, Spain), VetExpert PRRS Ab ELISA 4.0 (BioNote, Korea), Pigtype PRRSV Ab (Qiagen, Germany) and PrioCHECK PRRSV Antibody ELISA (ThermoFisher, USA), using serum samples obtained from 5 conventional PRRSV-positive and 5 PRRSV-negative Polish pig farms. Specificity of ELISAs ranged from 94.2% (ThermoFisher) to 100% (IDEXX and Hipra). ThermoFisher ELISA had the highest detection rate and detected 67.2% samples from PRRSV-positive farms as positive but considering its low specificity some of the positive results may be incorrect. IDEXX ELISA considered as a reference detected 64.8% positive sera in PRRSV-positive farms. On the other hand Hipra Elisa identified only 51.8% of samples as positive. The diagnostic sensitivity of five ELISAs relative to IDEXX ranged from 80.3% (Hipra) to 96.3% (ThermoFisher). Our study showed significant differences in specificity and diagnostic sensitivity between the compared kits. The differences in the performance appeared to be practically negligible on farms where early infection with PRRSV occurred. However, on PRRSV-negative farms, or farms with PRRSV stable sow herds, some ELISAs can give results not reflecting the infection status in specific age groups. CI - Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. FAU - Biernacka, Kinga AU - Biernacka K AD - Department of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland. FAU - Podgorska, Katarzyna AU - Podgorska K AD - Department of Swine Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, Partyzantow 57, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland. Electronic address: katarzyna.podgorska@piwet.pulawy.pl. FAU - Tyszka, Anna AU - Tyszka A AD - Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Vet Lab Group, Ostrodzka 46, 11-036 Gietrzwald, Poland. Electronic address: wdl.serologia@vetlabgroup.pl. FAU - Stadejek, Tomasz AU - Stadejek T AD - Department of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland. Electronic address: tomasz_stadejek@sggw.pl. LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article DEP - 20181006 PL - England TA - Res Vet Sci JT - Research in veterinary science JID - 0401300 RN - 0 (Antibodies, Viral) SB - IM MH - Animals MH - Antibodies, Viral/*blood MH - Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods/*veterinary MH - Female MH - Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome/*diagnosis/virology MH - Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/immunology/*isolation & purification MH - Sensitivity and Specificity MH - Swine OTO - NOTNLM OT - Comparison OT - ELISA OT - PRRSV OT - Serum OT - Swine EDAT- 2018/10/14 06:00 MHDA- 2019/02/01 06:00 CRDT- 2018/10/14 06:00 PHST- 2018/07/09 00:00 [received] PHST- 2018/10/03 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2018/10/05 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2018/10/14 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2019/02/01 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2018/10/14 06:00 [entrez] AID - S0034-5288(18)31337-7 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.10.005 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Res Vet Sci. 2018 Dec;121:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 6.