PMID- 30448187
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20190429
LR  - 20190429
IS  - 1542-2224 (Electronic)
IS  - 1067-2516 (Linking)
VI  - 58
IP  - 1
DP  - 2019 Jan
TI  - Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure 
      for Patients With Chronic Ankle Disability.
PG  - 38-41
LID - S1067-2516(18)30283-7 [pii]
LID - 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.07.007 [doi]
AB  - The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure is a valid, reliable, and widely used 
      self-reported questionnaire for the foot. It has been adapted and validated for a 
      Turkish-speaking population. The purpose of this study was to provide evidence 
      for validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Foot and Ankle Measure 
      (FAAM-T) in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). A total of 316 
      patients with CAI were enrolled. The internal consistency and test-retest 
      reliability were evaluated. Validity was examined using correlations with the 
      Short Form Health Survey version 2.0 (SF-36v2) questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha 
      scores were 0.94 and 0.96 for the the FAAM-T ADL (Activities of Daily Living) and 
      FAAM-T Sports subscales, respectively, indicating high internal consistency. For 
      the second administration, Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.96 for both 
      subscales of the FAAM-T. The test-retest reliability of the FAAM-T was very high 
      for both subscales with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.97 and 0.94, 
      respectively (p < .001). The standard error of the mean and minimal detectable 
      change were determined to be 2.5 and 6.7 for the FAAM-T ADL and 6.9 and 18.5 for 
      the FAAM-T Sport. The FAAM-T ADL and Sport subscales were strongly correlated 
      with the SF-36v2 PF (physical functioning; r = 0.51, r = 0.40, respectively; 
      p = .001) and SF-36v2 PCS (physical component scale; r = 0.64, r = 0.55, 
      respectively; p = .001). The weakest associations between the FAAM-T ADL and 
      Sport and the SF-36v2 were noted for the mental health subscale (r = 0.08 and 
      r = 0.03) and the SF-36v2 MCS (mental component scale; r = .05 and r = .006, 
      respectively). This study provides evidence for validity, internal consistency, 
      and test-retest reliability for the FAAM-T to evaluate patients with CAI.
CI  - Copyright (c) 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.
FAU - Anaforoglu Kulunkoglu, Bahar
AU  - Anaforoglu Kulunkoglu B
AD  - Assistant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of 
      Health Sciences, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: 
      banaforoglu@ybu.edu.tr.
FAU - Celik, Derya
AU  - Celik D
AD  - Associate Professor, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of 
      Health Sciences, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
DEP - 20181115
PL  - United States
TA  - J Foot Ankle Surg
JT  - The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American 
      College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons
JID - 9308427
SB  - IM
MH  - Adult
MH  - Ankle Joint/*physiopathology
MH  - Chronic Disease
MH  - Disability Evaluation
MH  - Female
MH  - Health Surveys
MH  - Humans
MH  - Joint Instability/complications/diagnosis/*physiopathology
MH  - Male
MH  - Range of Motion, Articular/*physiology
MH  - Reproducibility of Results
MH  - Turkey
MH  - Young Adult
OTO - NOTNLM
OT  - 2
OT  - Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
OT  - chronic ankle instability
OT  - reliability
OT  - self-reported outcome measurement
OT  - validity
EDAT- 2018/11/19 06:00
MHDA- 2019/04/30 06:00
CRDT- 2018/11/19 06:00
PHST- 2017/06/19 00:00 [received]
PHST- 2018/11/19 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2019/04/30 06:00 [medline]
PHST- 2018/11/19 06:00 [entrez]
AID - S1067-2516(18)30283-7 [pii]
AID - 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.07.007 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Jan;58(1):38-41. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.07.007. Epub 
      2018 Nov 15.