PMID- 30671683 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20190228 LR - 20200225 IS - 1573-2959 (Electronic) IS - 0167-6369 (Print) IS - 0167-6369 (Linking) VI - 191 IP - 2 DP - 2019 Jan 22 TI - Analysing the performance of low-cost air quality sensors, their drivers, relative benefits and calibration in cities-a case study in Sheffield. PG - 94 LID - 10.1007/s10661-019-7231-8 [doi] LID - 94 AB - Traditional real-time air quality monitoring instruments are expensive to install and maintain; therefore, such existing air quality monitoring networks are sparsely deployed and lack the measurement density to develop high-resolution spatiotemporal air pollutant maps. More recently, low-cost sensors have been used to collect high-resolution spatial and temporal air pollution data in real-time. In this paper, for the first time, Envirowatch E-MOTEs are employed for air quality monitoring as a case study in Sheffield. Ten E-MOTEs were deployed for a year (October 2016 to September 2017) monitoring several air pollutants (NO, NO(2), CO) and meteorological parameters. Their performance was compared to each other and to a reference instrument installed nearby. E-MOTEs were able to successfully capture the temporal variability such as diurnal, weekly and annual cycles in air pollutant concentrations and demonstrated significant similarity with reference instruments. NO(2) concentrations showed very strong positive correlation between various sensors. Mostly, correlation coefficients (r values) were greater than 0.92. CO from different sensors also had r values mostly greater than 0.92; however, NO showed r value less than 0.5. Furthermore, several multiple linear regression models (MLRM) and generalised additive models (GAM) were developed to calibrate the E-MOTE data and reproduce NO and NO(2) concentrations measured by the reference instruments. GAMs demonstrated significantly better performance than linear models by capturing the non-linear association between the response and explanatory variables. The best GAM developed for reproducing NO(2) concentrations returned values of 0.95, 3.91, 0.81, 0.005 and 0.61 for factor of two (FAC2), root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R(2)), normalised mean biased (NMB) and coefficient of efficiency (COE), respectively. The low-cost sensors offer a more affordable alternative for providing real-time high-resolution spatiotemporal air quality and meteorological parameter data with acceptable performance. FAU - Munir, Said AU - Munir S AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-7163-2107 AD - Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK. smunir2@sheffield.ac.uk. FAU - Mayfield, Martin AU - Mayfield M AD - Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK. FAU - Coca, Daniel AU - Coca D AD - Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK. FAU - Jubb, Stephen A AU - Jubb SA AD - Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK. FAU - Osammor, Ogo AU - Osammor O AD - Air Quality Monitoring & Modelling, Sheffield City Council, Howden House, 1 Union Street,, Sheffield, S1 2SH, UK. LA - eng GR - NA/Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council/ PT - Evaluation Study PT - Journal Article DEP - 20190122 PL - Netherlands TA - Environ Monit Assess JT - Environmental monitoring and assessment JID - 8508350 RN - 0 (Air Pollutants) RN - 0 (Particulate Matter) RN - 31C4KY9ESH (Nitric Oxide) RN - 7U1EE4V452 (Carbon Monoxide) RN - S7G510RUBH (Nitrogen Dioxide) SB - IM MH - Air Pollutants/*analysis MH - Air Pollution/*analysis MH - Calibration MH - Carbon Monoxide/analysis MH - Cities MH - Environmental Monitoring/*instrumentation/methods MH - Linear Models MH - Nitric Oxide/analysis MH - Nitrogen Dioxide/analysis MH - Particulate Matter/analysis MH - Time Factors MH - United Kingdom PMC - PMC6343017 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Air pollution monitoring OT - Envirowatch E-MOTEs OT - Generalised additive model OT - Sensor cost OT - Sensor networks EDAT- 2019/01/24 06:00 MHDA- 2019/03/01 06:00 PMCR- 2019/01/22 CRDT- 2019/01/24 06:00 PHST- 2018/09/23 00:00 [received] PHST- 2019/01/10 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2019/01/24 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2019/01/24 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2019/03/01 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2019/01/22 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.1007/s10661-019-7231-8 [pii] AID - 7231 [pii] AID - 10.1007/s10661-019-7231-8 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Jan 22;191(2):94. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7231-8.