PMID- 30863759 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20201001 IS - 2307-8960 (Print) IS - 2307-8960 (Electronic) IS - 2307-8960 (Linking) VI - 7 IP - 5 DP - 2019 Mar 6 TI - Docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil compared with epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil regimen for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PG - 600-615 LID - 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i5.600 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: As the first-line regimens for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, both docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) and epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (ECF) regimens are commonly used in clinical practice, but there is still controversy about which is better. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of DCF and ECF regimens by conducting this meta-analysis. METHODS: Computer searches in PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Science Direct, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and Scopus were performed to find the clinical studies of all comparisons between DCF and ECF regimens. We used progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse effects (AEs) as endpoints for analysis. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included seven qualified studies involving a total of 598 patients. The pooled hazard ratios between the DCF and ECF groups were comparable in PFS (95%CI: 0.58-1.46, P = 0.73), OS (95%CI: 0.65-1.10, P = 0.21), and total AEs (95%CI: 0.93-1.29, P = 0.30). The DCF group was significantly better than the ECF group in terms of ORR (95%CI: 1.13-1.75, P = 0.002) and DCR (95%CI: 1.03-1.41, P = 0.02). However, the incidence rate of grade 3-4 AEs was also greater in the DCF group than in the ECF group (95%CI: 1.16-1.88, P = 0.002), especially for neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION: With better ORR and DCR values, the DCF regimen seems to be more suitable for advanced gastric cancer than the ECF regimen. However, the higher rate of AEs in the DCF group still needs to be noticed. FAU - Li, Bo AU - Li B AD - Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China. FAU - Chen, Lian AU - Chen L AD - Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China. FAU - Luo, Hong-Liang AU - Luo HL AD - Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China. FAU - Yi, Feng-Ming AU - Yi FM AD - Department of Digestive Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China. FAU - Wei, Yi-Ping AU - Wei YP AD - Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China. FAU - Zhang, Wen-Xiong AU - Zhang WX AD - Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China. zwx123dr@126.com. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - United States TA - World J Clin Cases JT - World journal of clinical cases JID - 101618806 PMC - PMC6406203 OTO - NOTNLM OT - 5-fluorouracil OT - Chemotherapy OT - Cisplatin OT - Docetaxel OT - Epirubicin OT - Gastric cancer COIS- Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors deny any conflict of interest. EDAT- 2019/03/14 06:00 MHDA- 2019/03/14 06:01 PMCR- 2019/03/06 CRDT- 2019/03/14 06:00 PHST- 2018/10/31 00:00 [received] PHST- 2018/12/20 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2018/12/29 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2019/03/14 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2019/03/14 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2019/03/14 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2019/03/06 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i5.600 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - World J Clin Cases. 2019 Mar 6;7(5):600-615. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i5.600.