PMID- 31101372 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20200518 LR - 20211204 IS - 1879-114X (Electronic) IS - 0149-2918 (Linking) VI - 41 IP - 6 DP - 2019 Jun TI - Cost-Utility Analysis of Sacubitril/Valsartan Use Compared With Standard Care in Chronic Heart Failure Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction in South Korea. PG - 1066-1079 LID - S0149-2918(19)30198-5 [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.04.031 [doi] AB - PURPOSE: Sacubitril/valsartan, the first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), is a possible treatment option for chronic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan use in South Korea for treating patients with HFrEF compared with that of enalapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). METHODS: A Markov model was designed to estimate the lifetime cost-effectiveness of treatment for patients with HFrEF. Cohorts in the alive-state incurred a monthly risk of hospitalization because of deteriorated HF, adverse events (AEs), or death. Transition probabilities of sacubitril/valsartan and enalapril were estimated by using data from the PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) trial. The effectiveness of ARBs (eg, reduction in mortality and hospitalization rates) was assumed to be identical to that of enalapril, according to the results of the meta-analysis. However, there was no comparative evidence for AEs. We therefore conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis and adjusted the incidence rate of AEs for ARBs. The utility for estimating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was elicited by the survey of the general South Korean population by using EuroQol-5 dimensions. We calculated the medical costs, including medication, monitoring, hospitalization, AEs, and terminal care, from the health care sector perspective. Costs and effectiveness were discounted by 5%. One-way sensitivity analyses and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to determine the model robustness. FINDINGS: The total cost per patient for sacubitril/valsartan and enalapril was $25,832 and $18,295, respectively. Sacubitril/valsartan was associated with an approximately 8- month longer life expectancy compared with enalapril and a QALY gain of 0.59. As a result, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril was $12,722 per QALY. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of sacubitril/valsartan versus ARB was $11,970 with an incurred cost of $18,741 for the ARB group. The main results and those of various sensitivity analyses were lower than a threshold of $20,000. IMPLICATIONS: From a health care sector perspective, sacubitril/valsartan is a cost-effective treatment for HFrEF compared with enalapril and ARBs. This finding could be helpful for cardiologists or decision makers in reaching cost-effective choices regarding the treatment selection process. CI - Copyright (c) 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc. FAU - Park, Sun-Kyeong AU - Park SK AD - School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea. FAU - Hong, Sung-Hyun AU - Hong SH AD - School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea. FAU - Kim, HyoJin AU - Kim H AD - Patient Access, Novartis Korea, Ltd, Seoul, South Korea. FAU - Kim, Sungju AU - Kim S AD - Patient Access, Novartis Korea, Ltd, Seoul, South Korea. FAU - Lee, Eui-Kyung AU - Lee EK AD - School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea. Electronic address: ekyung@skku.edu. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Meta-Analysis PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't DEP - 20190515 PL - United States TA - Clin Ther JT - Clinical therapeutics JID - 7706726 RN - 0 (Aminobutyrates) RN - 0 (Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists) RN - 0 (Biphenyl Compounds) RN - 0 (Drug Combinations) RN - 0 (Tetrazoles) RN - 80M03YXJ7I (Valsartan) RN - WB8FT61183 (sacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combination) SB - IM MH - *Aminobutyrates/economics/therapeutic use MH - *Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/economics/therapeutic use MH - Biphenyl Compounds MH - Chronic Disease MH - Cost-Benefit Analysis MH - Drug Combinations MH - Health Care Costs MH - *Heart Failure/drug therapy/economics/epidemiology/physiopathology MH - Humans MH - Models, Statistical MH - Republic of Korea MH - *Tetrazoles/economics/therapeutic use MH - Valsartan MH - Ventricular Dysfunction, Left OTO - NOTNLM OT - Markov model OT - cost-effectiveness OT - heart failure OT - sacubitril/valsartan EDAT- 2019/05/19 06:00 MHDA- 2020/05/19 06:00 CRDT- 2019/05/19 06:00 PHST- 2018/12/14 00:00 [received] PHST- 2019/04/10 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2019/04/17 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2019/05/19 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2020/05/19 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2019/05/19 06:00 [entrez] AID - S0149-2918(19)30198-5 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.04.031 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Clin Ther. 2019 Jun;41(6):1066-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.04.031. Epub 2019 May 15.