PMID- 31269001 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20200309 LR - 20200309 IS - 1533-4287 (Electronic) IS - 1064-8011 (Linking) VI - 33 IP - 12 DP - 2019 Dec TI - Effect of Altering Body Posture and Barbell Position on the Within-Session Reliability and Magnitude of Force-Time Curve Characteristics in the Isometric Midthigh Pull. PG - 3252-3262 LID - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003254 [doi] AB - Guppy, SN, Brady, CJ, Kotani, Y, Stone, MH, Medic, N, and Haff, GG. Effect of altering body posture and barbell position on the within-session reliability and magnitude of force-time curve characteristics in the isometric midthigh pull. J Strength Cond Res 33(12): 3252-3262, 2019-A large degree of variation in the position used during isometric midthigh pull (IMTP) testing and conflicting results of the effects of these changes can be found in the literature. This study investigated the effect of altering body posture and barbell position on the reliability and magnitude of force-time characteristics generated during the IMTP. Seventeen strength-power athletes (n = 11 males, height: 177.5 +/- 7.0 cm, body mass: 90.0 +/- 14.1 kg, age: 30.6 +/- 10.4 years; n = 6 females, height: 165.8 +/- 11.4 cm; body mass: 66.4 +/- 13.9 kg, age: 30.8 +/- 8.7 years) with greater than 6 months of training experience in the clean (1 repetition maximum: 118.5 +/- 20.6 kg, 77.5 +/- 10.4 kg) volunteered to undertake the experimental protocol. Subjects performed the IMTP using 4 combinations of hip and knee angles, and 2 different barbell positions. The first barbell position corresponded to the second pull of the clean, while the second rested at the midpoint between the iliac crest and the patella. Peak force (PF), time-specific force (F50, F90, F150, F200, and F250), peak rate of force development (pRFD), and impulse (IMP) time bands were reliable in all 4 testing positions examined. Statistically greater PF, F50, F90, F150, F200, F250, pRFD, and IMP0-50, IMP0-90, IMP0-150, and IMP0-200 were generated in a testing position corresponding to the second pull of the clean when compared with a bent over torso angle, regardless of the barbell position used. Moderate to large effect sizes favoring a testing position corresponding to the second pull were also found. Overall, when performing the IMTP, an upright torso and a barbell position that matches the second pull of the clean should be used. FAU - Guppy, Stuart N AU - Guppy SN AD - Center for Exercise and Sports Science Research, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia. FAU - Brady, Claire J AU - Brady CJ AD - Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. FAU - Kotani, Yosuke AU - Kotani Y AD - Center for Exercise and Sports Science Research, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia. FAU - Stone, Michael H AU - Stone MH AD - Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee. FAU - Medic, Nikola AU - Medic N AD - Center for Exercise and Sports Science Research, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia. FAU - Haff, G Gregory AU - Haff GG AD - Center for Exercise and Sports Science Research, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Randomized Controlled Trial PL - United States TA - J Strength Cond Res JT - Journal of strength and conditioning research JID - 9415084 SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Exercise Test/*methods/*standards MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Isometric Contraction/*physiology MH - Knee Joint MH - Male MH - Muscle Strength/*physiology MH - Posture/*physiology MH - Reproducibility of Results MH - Young Adult EDAT- 2019/07/04 06:00 MHDA- 2020/03/10 06:00 CRDT- 2019/07/04 06:00 PHST- 2019/07/04 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2020/03/10 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2019/07/04 06:00 [entrez] AID - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003254 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Dec;33(12):3252-3262. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003254.