PMID- 31554328 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE DCOM- 20190926 LR - 20191108 IS - 1424-8220 (Electronic) IS - 1424-8220 (Linking) VI - 19 IP - 19 DP - 2019 Sep 24 TI - Bridging Terrestrial Water Storage Anomaly During GRACE/GRACE-FO Gap Using SSA Method: A Case Study in China. LID - 10.3390/s19194144 [doi] LID - 4144 AB - The terrestrial water storage anomaly (TWSA) gap between the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and its follow-on mission (GRACE-FO) is now a significant issue for scientific research in high-resolution time-variable gravity fields. This paper proposes the use of singular spectrum analysis (SSA) to predict the TWSA derived from GRACE. We designed a case study in six regions in China (North China Plain (NCP), Southwest China (SWC), Three-River Headwaters Region (TRHR), Tianshan Mountains Region (TSMR), Heihe River Basin (HRB), and Lishui and Wenzhou area (LSWZ)) using GRACE RL06 data from January 2003 to August 2016 for inversion, which were compared with Center for Space Research (CSR), Helmholtz-Centre Potsdam-German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)'s Mascon (Mass Concentration) RL05, and JPL's Mascon RL06. We evaluated the accuracy of SSA prediction on different temporal scales based on the correlation coefficient (R), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and root mean square error (RMSE), which were compared with that of an auto-regressive and moving average (ARMA) model. The TWSA from September 2016 to May 2019 were predicted using SSA, which was verified using Mascon RL06, the Global Land Data Assimilation System model, and GRACE-FO results. The results show that: (1) TWSA derived from GRACE agreed well with Mascon in most regions, with the highest consistency with Mascon RL06 and (2) prediction accuracy of GRACE in TRHR and SWC was higher. SSA reconstruction improved R, NSE, and RMSE compared with those of ARMA. The R values for predicting TWS in the six regions using the SSA method were 0.34-0.98, which was better than those for ARMA (0.26-0.97), and the RMSE values were 0.03-5.55 cm, which were better than the 2.29-5.11 cm RMSE for ARMA as a whole. (3) The SSA method produced better predictions for obvious periodic and trending characteristics in the TWSA in most regions, whereas the detailed signal could not be effectively predicted. (4) The predicted TWSA from September 2016 to May 2019 were basically consistent with Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) results, and the predicted TWSA during June 2018 to May 2019 agreed well with GRACE-FO results. The research method in this paper provides a reference for bridging the gap in the TWSA between GRACE and GRACE-FO. FAU - Li, Wanqiu AU - Li W AD - Chinese Academy of Surveying & Mapping, Beijing 100830, China. FAU - Wang, Wei AU - Wang W AUID- ORCID: 0000-0003-2035-7093 AD - Chinese Academy of Surveying & Mapping, Beijing 100830, China. wangwei@casm.ac.cn. FAU - Zhang, Chuanyin AU - Zhang C AD - Chinese Academy of Surveying & Mapping, Beijing 100830, China. FAU - Wen, Hanjiang AU - Wen H AD - Chinese Academy of Surveying & Mapping, Beijing 100830, China. FAU - Zhong, Yulong AU - Zhong Y AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-6172-2598 AD - School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China. FAU - Zhu, Yu AU - Zhu Y AD - Institute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China. FAU - Li, Zhen AU - Li Z AD - GNSS Research Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China. LA - eng GR - No. 41374081 and No. 41674024;No. 2016YFB0501702;No. AR1905 and No. 7771806;No. SDKDYC190203/National Natural Science Foundation of China;Key Research and Development Program;the Fundamental Research Funds for Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping;Innovation Fund Designated for Graduate Students of Shandong University of Science and Technology/ PT - Journal Article DEP - 20190924 PL - Switzerland TA - Sensors (Basel) JT - Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) JID - 101204366 SB - IM PMC - PMC6806599 OTO - NOTNLM OT - GRACE OT - SSA OT - TWSA OT - data gap OT - prediction COIS- The authors declare no conflict of interest. EDAT- 2019/09/27 06:00 MHDA- 2019/09/27 06:01 PMCR- 2019/10/01 CRDT- 2019/09/27 06:00 PHST- 2019/07/31 00:00 [received] PHST- 2019/09/20 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2019/09/22 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2019/09/27 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2019/09/27 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2019/09/27 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2019/10/01 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - s19194144 [pii] AID - sensors-19-04144 [pii] AID - 10.3390/s19194144 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Sensors (Basel). 2019 Sep 24;19(19):4144. doi: 10.3390/s19194144.