PMID- 31556679
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20200325
LR  - 20200325
IS  - 1939-134X (Electronic)
IS  - 1040-3590 (Linking)
VI  - 32
IP  - 1
DP  - 2020 Jan
TI  - The Personality Inventory for ICD-11: Investigating reliability, structural and 
      concurrent validity, and method variance.
PG  - 8-17
LID - 10.1037/pas0000776 [doi]
AB  - The 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases and Related 
      Health Problems (ICD-11), recently approved by the World Health Organization, 
      contains a new diagnostic approach for personality disorders. This approach 
      partly involves the consideration of 5 dimensional trait domain 
      qualifiers-Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Dissocial, Disinhibition, and 
      Anankastia. Oltmanns and Widiger (2018) recently developed a self-report measure, 
      the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD), to assess the 5 domains; however, 
      further examination of the psychometric properties of the PiCD is warranted due 
      to its limited research base. The present study aimed to further examine the 
      reliability, structural and concurrent validity, and method variance of the PiCD 
      in an ethnically diverse undergraduate sample (N = 518), who were also 
      administered the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form. 
      First, results suggested that the PiCD domain scales exhibited adequate internal 
      consistency reliability via coefficient categorical omega (range = .77-.87). 
      Next, exploratory structural equation modeling results suggested support for a 
      4-factor solution, with the 4th factor thought to represent a bipolar continuum 
      of Anankastia to Disinhibition severity. Random-intercept factor analysis results 
      suggested a small amount of variance in items (4.88%) attributable to 
      idiosyncratic scale usage. Lastly, relations between PiCD domains and Minnesota 
      Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form scales (Personality 
      Psychopathology-5 and Higher Order scales) provided support for the validity of 
      the Negative Affectivity, Detachment, and Dissocial domains, though relatively 
      less support for the Disinhibition and Anankastia domains. Further examination of 
      other psychometric properties and the nomological network of the PiCD is 
      recommended. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
FAU - Carnovale, Michael
AU  - Carnovale M
AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-1811-030X
AD  - Graduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science.
FAU - Sellbom, Martin
AU  - Sellbom M
AD  - Department of Psychology.
FAU - Bagby, R Michael
AU  - Bagby RM
AD  - Department of Psychology.
LA  - eng
GR  - University of Minnesota Press/
PT  - Journal Article
PT  - Validation Study
DEP - 20190926
PL  - United States
TA  - Psychol Assess
JT  - Psychological assessment
JID - 8915253
SB  - IM
MH  - Adolescent
MH  - Adult
MH  - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
MH  - Factor Analysis, Statistical
MH  - Female
MH  - Humans
MH  - *International Classification of Diseases
MH  - Male
MH  - Middle Aged
MH  - *Personality
MH  - Personality Disorders/*diagnosis/psychology
MH  - *Personality Inventory
MH  - Psychometrics
MH  - Reproducibility of Results
MH  - Young Adult
EDAT- 2019/09/27 06:00
MHDA- 2020/03/26 06:00
CRDT- 2019/09/27 06:00
PHST- 2019/09/27 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2020/03/26 06:00 [medline]
PHST- 2019/09/27 06:00 [entrez]
AID - 2019-57538-001 [pii]
AID - 10.1037/pas0000776 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):8-17. doi: 10.1037/pas0000776. Epub 2019 Sep 26.