PMID- 31566514 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20200226 LR - 20200226 IS - 0952-6862 (Print) IS - 0952-6862 (Linking) VI - 32 IP - 8 DP - 2019 Oct 14 TI - Cost-effectiveness of Hepatitis A vaccination in a developed and developing country. PG - 1175-1199 LID - 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2019-0096 [doi] AB - PURPOSE: Hepatitis A is a prevalent disease that is largely preventable by vaccine usage. The vaccine for this illness is highly underused in most regions. In an attempt to find the strategies that are most beneficial in regard to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost in current environments, the purpose of this paper is to conduct cost-effectiveness analyses to investigate vaccination strategies in a more economically developed country (MEDC), generally known as a "developed" area: the USA, and a less economically developed country (LEDC), generally known as a "developing" area: the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This study used a dynamic transmission model for comparative effectiveness analyses. The model ran two different scenarios. The two regions studied have different policies and strategies for Hepatitis A vaccination currently, and also used different strategies in 2009. In the USA, a universal vaccination policy was modeled, along with a scenario in which it was removed. In Rio de Janeiro, a no vaccination policy was modeled, along with a scenario in which a universal vaccination policy was effected. FINDINGS: The comparison of resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio values to accepted threshold values showed universal vaccination to be cost-effective in both the USA and Rio de Janeiro as compared to no vaccination. When episode and vaccination costs and vaccination efficacy were varied, this still remained true. Universal vaccination was found to result in lower incidence of Hepatitis A in both the USA and Rio de Janeiro. Over the twenty-year time horizon, universal vaccination is projected to prevent 506,945 cases of symptomatic Hepatitis A in the USA and 42,318 cases of Hepatitis A in Rio de Janeiro. Other benefits include a projected increase in cumulative QALYs through the use of universal vaccination. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This analysis showed universal vaccination to be cost-effective as compared to no vaccination, and portions of the study's approach had not previously been applied in tandem to investigate Hepatitis A interventions. The results may help foster higher compliance rates for Hepatitis A vaccination and even greater per-person economic benefits of universal vaccination, particularly in the USA. The purpose of this study is also to encourage elevated levels of surveillance on age of infection in developing regions and consistent reevaluation utilizing dynamic transmission models in both the USA and Brazil, as well as other rapidly developing regions, in order to prevent future epidemics and costs associated with the disease. FAU - Ghildayal, Nidhi AU - Ghildayal N AD - University of Minnesota Twin Cities , Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - England TA - Int J Health Care Qual Assur JT - International journal of health care quality assurance JID - 8916799 MH - Adolescent MH - Adult MH - Brazil/epidemiology MH - Child MH - Child, Preschool MH - *Cost-Benefit Analysis MH - *Developing Countries MH - Hepatitis A/epidemiology/*prevention & control MH - Humans MH - Infant MH - Middle Aged MH - Quality-Adjusted Life Years MH - Vaccination/*economics/*trends MH - Young Adult OTO - NOTNLM OT - Comparative effectiveness analysis OT - Dynamic transmission model OT - Hepatitis A vaccination strategies OT - Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio EDAT- 2019/10/01 06:00 MHDA- 2020/02/27 06:00 CRDT- 2019/10/01 06:00 PHST- 2019/10/01 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2019/10/01 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2020/02/27 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2019-0096 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Oct 14;32(8):1175-1199. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2019-0096.