PMID- 31721394 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20210728 LR - 20210728 IS - 1365-2753 (Electronic) IS - 1356-1294 (Linking) VI - 26 IP - 4 DP - 2020 Aug TI - Optimizing the measurement of comorbidity for a South Australian colorectal cancer population using administrative data. PG - 1250-1258 LID - 10.1111/jep.13305 [doi] AB - RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: In epidemiological research, it is essential to account for the confounding effects of factors such as age, stage, and comorbidity for accurate prediction of cancer outcomes. There are several internationally developed and commonly used comorbidity indices. However, none are regarded as the gold-standard method. This study will assess and compare the predictive validity of established indices for use in a South Australian (SA) colorectal cancer (CRC) population against a local index. Furthermore, the prognostic influence of comorbidity on survival is investigated. METHODS: A population-based study of patients diagnosed with CRC from 2003 to 2012 and linked to in-hospital data to retrieve comorbidity information was conducted. The predictive performance of established indices, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), National Cancer Institute comorbidity index (NCI), Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI), and C3 index was evaluated using the Fine and Gray competing risk regression and reported using measures of calibration and discrimination, area under the curve (AUC), and Brier score. Furthermore, to identify the optimal index, a local CRC comorbidity index (CRCCI) was also developed and its performance compared with the established indices. RESULTS: Comorbidity models adjusted for age, sex, and stage showed that all indices were good predictors of mortality as measured by the AUC (CCI: 0.738, NCI: 0.742, ECI: 0.733, C3: 0.739). CRCCI had similar mortality prediction as established indices (CRCCI: 0.747). There was a significant increase in cumulative risk of noncancer and CRC-specific mortality with increase in comorbidity scores. The two most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The existing indices are still valid for adjusting for comorbidity and accurately predicting mortality in an SA CRC population. Internationally developed indices are preferred when policymakers and researchers wish to compare local study results with those of studies (national and international) that have used these indices. Comorbidity is a predictor of mortality and should be considered when assessing CRC survival. CI - (c) 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. FAU - Pule, Lettie AU - Pule L AUID- ORCID: 0000-0001-6114-9317 AD - Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. FAU - Buckley, Elizabeth AU - Buckley E AUID- ORCID: 0000-0001-8980-1194 AD - Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. FAU - Niyonsenga, Theo AU - Niyonsenga T AD - Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. AD - Centre for Research and Action in Public Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia. FAU - Roder, David AU - Roder D AUID- ORCID: 0000-0001-6442-4409 AD - Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. LA - eng GR - Kate Powell and SA Clinical Cancer Registry/ GR - South Australian Health Epidemiology Branch/ GR - University of South Australia/ PT - Journal Article DEP - 20191113 PL - England TA - J Eval Clin Pract JT - Journal of evaluation in clinical practice JID - 9609066 SB - IM MH - Australia MH - *Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology MH - Comorbidity MH - Humans MH - Prognosis MH - South Australia/epidemiology OTO - NOTNLM OT - colorectal cancer OT - comorbidity OT - prediction models OT - survival EDAT- 2019/11/14 06:00 MHDA- 2021/07/29 06:00 CRDT- 2019/11/14 06:00 PHST- 2019/03/15 00:00 [received] PHST- 2019/09/11 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2019/10/08 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2019/11/14 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2021/07/29 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2019/11/14 06:00 [entrez] AID - 10.1111/jep.13305 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Aug;26(4):1250-1258. doi: 10.1111/jep.13305. Epub 2019 Nov 13.