PMID- 31807089 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20220411 IS - 1179-1462 (Electronic) IS - 1179-1462 (Linking) VI - 11 DP - 2019 TI - Does Patient Blinding Influence Clinical Outcomes After Annular Closure Device Implantation? A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. PG - 177-182 LID - 10.2147/ORR.S216980 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Awareness of treatment group assignment in a clinical trial may influence patient behavior and bias outcome reporting. The objective of this study was to compare 2-year clinical outcomes in blinded vs unblinded patients who were treated with lumbar discectomy and a bone-anchored annular closure device (ACD) for prevention of lumbar disc reherniation. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a randomized trial comparing lumbar discectomy with (n=272) vs without (n=278) implantation of a bone-anchored ACD. Among patients who received ACD implantation, 35 (13%) were blinded and 237 (87%) were unblinded to treatment allocation. In patients treated with ACD, propensity score-matching (1:1) was performed to account for imbalances in patient characteristics between blinded and unblinded groups. Key clinical outcomes were back pain severity (0-100 scale), leg pain severity (0-100 scale), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, 0-100 scale), symptomatic reherniation, reoperation at the treated lumbar level, and device- or procedure-related serious adverse events (AEs). Outcomes were reported through 2 years of follow-up, which coincided with the time at which blinded patients were unblinded. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in 2-year outcomes between propensity score-matched blinded (n=35) and unblinded (n=35) patients treated with the ACD. In blinded vs unblinded ACD patients compared to baseline, back pain severity decreased by 40 vs 37 points (P=0.61), leg pain severity decreased by 75 points in each group (P>0.99), and ODI decreased by 47 vs 43 points (P=0.19). The risks of symptomatic reherniation (5.7% vs 9.1%; P=0.59), reoperation (8.6% vs 12.2%, P=0.62), and device- or procedure-related serious AEs (5.7% vs 8.9%, P=0.63) were comparably low in blinded and unblinded patients. CONCLUSION: In patients treated with lumbar discectomy and a bone-anchored ACD, there were no clinically important or statistically significant differences in back pain, leg pain, ODI, symptomatic reherniation, reoperation, or serious AEs over 2 years of follow-up when comparing patients who were blinded vs unblinded to their treatment assignment. The main limitations of this study were the post hoc nature of the analysis and the potential for bias due to surgeon awareness of treatment assignment. CI - (c) 2019 Bouma et al. FAU - Bouma, Gerrit J AU - Bouma GJ AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-2772-7475 AD - Department of Neurosurgery, OLVG and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. FAU - van den Brink, Wimar AU - van den Brink W AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-4588-2209 AD - Neurochirurgisch Centrum Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands. FAU - Miller, Larry E AU - Miller LE AUID- ORCID: 0000-0003-1594-1885 AD - Miller Scientific Consulting, Asheville, NC, USA. FAU - Wolfs, Jasper Fc AU - Wolfs JF AD - Haaglanden Medical Center Westeinde Antoniushove, Leidschendam, The Netherlands. FAU - Arts, Mark P AU - Arts MP AD - Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center Westeinde, The Hague, The Netherlands. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20191108 PL - New Zealand TA - Orthop Res Rev JT - Orthopedic research and reviews JID - 101531415 PMC - PMC6850684 OTO - NOTNLM OT - annulus fibrosus OT - blinding OT - disc OT - discectomy OT - elderly OT - herniation OT - lumbar OT - sciatica COIS- Gerrit Bouma reports grants from Intrinsic Therapeutics, during the conduct of the study. Wimar van den Brink reports financial support for study conductance from Intrinsic Therapeutics. Larry Miller reports consultancy with Intrinsic Therapeutics. Jasper Wolfs reports nonfinancial support from Intrinsic Therapeutics; Consultancy activities Training and education from Zimmer Biomet, Safe Orthopaedics, Silony, and has a patent with EIT GMBH with royalties paid, outside the submitted work. Mart Arts reports consultancy with Intrinsic Therapeutics, Zimmer Biomet, EIT, Baxter and Silony, outside the submitted work, and has a patent with EIT GMBH with royalties paid. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work. EDAT- 2019/12/07 06:00 MHDA- 2019/12/07 06:01 PMCR- 2019/11/08 CRDT- 2019/12/07 06:00 PHST- 2019/05/24 00:00 [received] PHST- 2019/10/25 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2019/12/07 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2019/12/07 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2019/12/07 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2019/11/08 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 216980 [pii] AID - 10.2147/ORR.S216980 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Orthop Res Rev. 2019 Nov 8;11:177-182. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S216980. eCollection 2019.