PMID- 31808397 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20200122 LR - 20200804 IS - 1677-6119 (Electronic) IS - 1677-5538 (Print) IS - 1677-5538 (Linking) VI - 45 IP - 6 DP - 2019 Nov-Dec TI - Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or conformational radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with conventional fractionation for prostate cancer: Is there any clinical difference? PG - 1105-1112 LID - 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0842 [doi] AB - PURPOSE: To compare the treatment outcomes of a cohort of prostate cancer patients treated with conventional schedule using IMRT or 3DRT technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2010-2017, 485 men with localized prostate cancer were treated with conventional radiotherapy schedule with a total dose >/=74Gy using IMRT (231) or 3DCRT (254). Late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity were retrospectively evaluated according to modifi ed RTOG criteria. The biochemical control was defi ned by the Phoenix criteria (nadir + 2ng/mL). The comparison between the groups included biochemical recurrence free survival (bRFS), overall survival (OS) and late toxicity. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 51 months (IMRT=49 and 3DRT=51 months), the maximal late GU for >/= grade- 2 during the entire period of follow-up was 13.1% in the IMRT and 15.4% in the 3DRT (p=0.85). The maximal late GI >/= grade- 2 in the IMRT was 10% and in the 3DRT 24% (p=0.0001). The 5-year bRFS for all risk groups with IMRT and 3D-CRT was 87.5% vs. 87.2% (p=0.415). Considering the risk-groups no signifi cant difference for low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups between IMRT (low-95.3%, intermediate-86.2% and high-73%) and 3D-CRT (low-96.4%, intermediate-88.2% and high-76.6%, p=0.448) was observed. No signifi cant differences for OS and DMFS were observed comparing treatment groups. CONCLUSION: IMRT reduces signifi cantly the risk of late GI severe complication compared with 3D-CRT using conventional fractionation with a total dose >/=74Gy without any differences for bRFS and OS. CI - Copyright(R) by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology. FAU - Viani, Gustavo AU - Viani G AD - Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto, Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brasil. FAU - Hamamura, Ana Carolina AU - Hamamura AC AD - Departamento de Radioterapia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brasil. FAU - Faustino, Alexandre C AU - Faustino AC AD - Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto, Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brasil. LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PL - Brazil TA - Int Braz J Urol JT - International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology JID - 101158091 SB - IM MH - Aged MH - Disease-Free Survival MH - Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation MH - Gastrointestinal Tract/radiation effects MH - Humans MH - Kaplan-Meier Estimate MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Neoplasm Grading MH - Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality/pathology/*radiotherapy MH - Radiation Injuries MH - Radiotherapy Dosage MH - Radiotherapy, Conformal/adverse effects/*methods MH - Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects/*methods MH - Retrospective Studies MH - Risk Assessment MH - Risk Factors MH - Time Factors MH - Urogenital System/radiation effects PMC - PMC6909869 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Prostatic Neoplasms OT - Radiotherapy, Conformal OT - Toxicity [Subheading] COIS- None declared. EDAT- 2019/12/07 06:00 MHDA- 2020/01/23 06:00 PMCR- 2019/12/17 CRDT- 2019/12/07 06:00 PHST- 2019/01/23 00:00 [received] PHST- 2019/05/01 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2019/12/07 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2019/12/07 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2020/01/23 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2019/12/17 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - IBJU20180842 [pii] AID - S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0842 [pii] AID - 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0842 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Nov-Dec;45(6):1105-1112. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0842.