PMID- 31850481 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20200316 LR - 20200316 IS - 1972-6007 (Electronic) IS - 0009-9074 (Linking) VI - 170 IP - 1 DP - 2020 Jan-Feb TI - A new method for left carotid angiography: use right judkins 4 guiding (6f) catheter with 2 side holes. PG - e30-e35 LID - 10.7417/CT.2020.2185 [doi] AB - OBJECTIVE: To introduce a rapid and simple technique to engage and localize through left common carotid (LCCA) artery during selective carotid angiography using the same type of catheter (6F Medtronic/launcher Judkins Right Guide Catheter, 4.0 Tip,2 Side holes, U.S.A.). METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups as new method and conventional method group including 295 and 292 prior to carotid angiography, respectively. The primary endpoints of this study included an analysis of total procedure time, time required for cannulation of left common carotid artery, fluoroscopy time and selective imaging success for left common carotid artery, feasibility, safety, amount of radio opaque agent and radiation exposure. RESULTS: Our novel method applied using a single catheter shortened total procedure time (5.41 +/- 1.56 min. vs. 7.52 +/- 2.48 min., respectively, p<0.001), fluoroscopy time (98 +/- 9 sec. vs. 210 +/- 19 sec., respectively, p<0.001), duration of left carotid artery cannulation (15 +/- 1.2 sec vs. 42 +/- 1.9 sec, respectively, p< 0.001). Use of our method reduced radiation exposure (120 +/- 17 mGy vs. 217 +/- 11 mGy, respectively, p<0.001), amount of contrast agent (44.99 +/- 12.84 ml vs. 59.89 +/- 18.93 ml, respectively, p<0.001). Aortic arch angiography was not needed in the first group compared with the conventional method group (0% vs. 29%, respectively, p<0.001). Also a higher success was achieved in cannulation of left common carotid artery using an identical catheter compared with application of conventional methods requiring use of different types of catheter (100% vs. 60%, respectively, p<0.001). No major complication and mortality was found due to use of both methods. However, a statistically insignificant elevation in minor complication was encountered in the patient group who underwent coronary angiography by the conventional method (3% vs. 7%, respectively, p<0.064). CONCLUSIONS: This new method is more easily applicable with a shorter duration for cannulation and localization of LCCA, safer for the patients with use of a limited amount of radio-opaque agent and finally cost-effective by requiring only one type of catheter and a limited. FAU - Gocer, H AU - Gocer H AD - Izmir Medicalpark Hospital, Cardiology, Izmir, Turkey. FAU - Keskin, G AU - Keskin G AD - Amasya Medical School, Cardiology, Amasya, Turkey. FAU - Gunday, M AU - Gunday M AD - Afyon Health Sciences University, Cardiovascular Surgery, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. FAU - Unal, M AU - Unal M AD - Bicard Clinic, Cardiovascular Surgery, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PL - Italy TA - Clin Ter JT - La Clinica terapeutica JID - 0372604 RN - 0 (Contrast Media) SB - IM MH - Aged MH - Cardiac Catheterization/*methods MH - Carotid Arteries/*diagnostic imaging MH - Catheterization MH - Catheters/*standards MH - Contrast Media/*standards MH - Coronary Angiography/*methods MH - Female MH - Fluoroscopy/*methods MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Radial Artery/*diagnostic imaging OTO - NOTNLM OT - Angiography OT - Carotid OT - Judkins EDAT- 2019/12/19 06:00 MHDA- 2020/03/17 06:00 CRDT- 2019/12/19 06:00 PHST- 2019/12/19 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2019/12/19 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2020/03/17 06:00 [medline] AID - 10.7417/CT.2020.2185 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Clin Ter. 2020 Jan-Feb;170(1):e30-e35. doi: 10.7417/CT.2020.2185.