PMID- 32191999 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20200923 LR - 20231213 IS - 1660-4601 (Electronic) IS - 1661-7827 (Print) IS - 1660-4601 (Linking) VI - 17 IP - 6 DP - 2020 Mar 17 TI - Simultaneous Analysis and Dietary Exposure Risk Assessment of Fomesafen, Clomazone, Clethodim and Its Two Metabolites in Soybean Ecosystem. LID - 10.3390/ijerph17061951 [doi] LID - 1951 AB - A commercial formulation, 37% dispersible oil suspension (DOS) (fomesafen, clomazone, and clethodim), is being registered in China to control annual or perennial weeds in soybean fields. In this paper, a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method with QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe) sample preparation was developed for the simultaneous determination of fomesafen, clomazone, clethodim, and its two metabolites (CSO and CSO(2)) in soybean, green soybean, and soybean straw samples. The mean recoveries of our developed method for the five analytes in three matrices were ranged from 71% to 116% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) less than 12.6%. The limits of quantification (LOQs) were 0.01 mg/kg in soybean, 0.01 mg/kg in green soybean, and 0.02 mg/kg in soybean straw while the limits of detection (LODs) ranged from 0.018 to 0.125 mug/kg for these five analytes. The highest final residual amount of CSO(2) in green soybean samples (0.015 mg/kg) appeared in Anhui, and the highest in soybean straw samples was 0.029 mg/kg in Guangxi, whilst the terminal residues of fomesafen, clomazone, clethodim and CSO were lower than LOQs (0.01 mg/kg) in all samples. Furthermore, these terminal residues were all lower than the maximum residue limits (MRLs) set by China (0.1 mg/kg for fomesafen and clethodim, 0.05 mg/kg for clomazone) at harvest. Additional chronic dietary risk was evaluated using a risk quotients (RQs) method based on Chinese dietary habits. The chronic dietary exposure risk quotients were 4.3 for fomesafen, 0.12 for clomazone, and 19.3 for clethodim, respectively, which were significantly lower than 100. These results demonstrated that the dietary exposure risk of fomesafen, clomazone, and clethodim used in soybean according to good agricultural practices (GAP) was acceptable and would not pose an unacceptable health risk to Chinese consumers. These results not only offer insight with respect to the analytes, but also contribute to environmental protection and food safety. FAU - Pang, Kyongjin AU - Pang K AUID- ORCID: 0000-0003-3036-5054 AD - School of Chemistry and Biological Engineering, University of Science Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China. FAU - Hu, Jiye AU - Hu J AD - School of Chemistry and Biological Engineering, University of Science Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't DEP - 20200317 PL - Switzerland TA - Int J Environ Res Public Health JT - International journal of environmental research and public health JID - 101238455 RN - 0 (Benzamides) RN - 0 (Cyclohexanones) RN - 0 (Isoxazoles) RN - 0 (Oxazolidinones) RN - 0 (Pesticide Residues) RN - 05SB62IB6F (clethodim) RN - 570RAC03NF (clomazone) RN - M0A3U4CDTF (fomesafen) SB - IM MH - *Benzamides/toxicity MH - China MH - *Cyclohexanones/toxicity MH - *Dietary Exposure MH - Ecosystem MH - Humans MH - *Isoxazoles/toxicity MH - *Oxazolidinones/toxicity MH - *Pesticide Residues/toxicity MH - Risk Assessment MH - Glycine max/chemistry MH - Tandem Mass Spectrometry PMC - PMC7143629 OTO - NOTNLM OT - LC-MS/MS OT - clethodim and its metabolites OT - clomazone OT - dietary exposure risk assessment OT - fomesafen COIS- The authors declare no conflict of interest. EDAT- 2020/03/21 06:00 MHDA- 2020/09/24 06:00 PMCR- 2020/03/01 CRDT- 2020/03/21 06:00 PHST- 2020/02/20 00:00 [received] PHST- 2020/03/03 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2020/03/08 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2020/03/21 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2020/03/21 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2020/09/24 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2020/03/01 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - ijerph17061951 [pii] AID - ijerph-17-01951 [pii] AID - 10.3390/ijerph17061951 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 17;17(6):1951. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061951.