PMID- 32222918
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20200710
LR  - 20200710
IS  - 1614-7499 (Electronic)
IS  - 0944-1344 (Linking)
VI  - 27
IP  - 16
DP  - 2020 Jun
TI  - Decision-making for the selection of different leachate treatment/management 
      methods: the ANP and PROMETHEE approaches.
PG  - 19798-19809
LID - 10.1007/s11356-020-08524-7 [doi]
AB  - Municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill leachate is a highly contaminated liquid 
      effluent. Leachate has a complex nature that needs to be appropriately treated 
      before being discharged into the environment. There are various options for 
      leachate treatment. Deciding which option should be applied is a complex process, 
      since it depends on many factors that need to provide a balance between the 
      technical, economic, and environmental aspects of sustainability. Multi-criteria 
      decision-making (MCDM) methods are useful techniques to solve complex problems 
      that cannot be easily solved. In this study, MCDM techniques are used for an 
      evaluation of four different leachate treatment options: recirculation of 
      leachate to a landfill site (A1), combined treatment with municipal wastewater 
      (A2), anaerobic and aerobic sequential treatment (A3), and advanced leachate 
      treatment based on membrane processes (A4). The selection of the most appropriate 
      one, based on the criteria, analytic network process (ANP), and preference 
      ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) methods, was 
      applied as MCDM techniques using the Super Decisions software and D-Sight 
      software, respectively. Both the ANP and the PROMETHEE analysis results 
      demonstrate that option A2 is the most appropriate for all of the 
      decision-makers.
FAU - Ozdemir, Alp
AU  - Ozdemir A
AD  - Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Eskisehir 
      Technical University, Iki Eylul Campus, 26555, Eskisehir, Turkey. 
      alpozdemir@eskisehir.edu.tr.
FAU - Ozkan, Aysun
AU  - Ozkan A
AD  - Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Eskisehir 
      Technical University, Iki Eylul Campus, 26555, Eskisehir, Turkey.
FAU - Gunkaya, Zerrin
AU  - Gunkaya Z
AD  - Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Eskisehir 
      Technical University, Iki Eylul Campus, 26555, Eskisehir, Turkey.
FAU - Banar, Mufide
AU  - Banar M
AD  - Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Eskisehir 
      Technical University, Iki Eylul Campus, 26555, Eskisehir, Turkey.
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
DEP - 20200328
PL  - Germany
TA  - Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
JT  - Environmental science and pollution research international
JID - 9441769
RN  - 0 (Solid Waste)
RN  - 0 (Water Pollutants, Chemical)
SB  - IM
MH  - Organizations
MH  - *Refuse Disposal
MH  - Solid Waste/analysis
MH  - Waste Disposal Facilities
MH  - Water Pollutants, Chemical/*analysis
OTO - NOTNLM
OT  - Analytic network process (ANP)
OT  - Leachate treatment
OT  - Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM)
OT  - Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE)
EDAT- 2020/03/31 06:00
MHDA- 2020/07/11 06:00
CRDT- 2020/03/31 06:00
PHST- 2019/11/29 00:00 [received]
PHST- 2020/03/18 00:00 [accepted]
PHST- 2020/03/31 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2020/07/11 06:00 [medline]
PHST- 2020/03/31 06:00 [entrez]
AID - 10.1007/s11356-020-08524-7 [pii]
AID - 10.1007/s11356-020-08524-7 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(16):19798-19809. doi: 
      10.1007/s11356-020-08524-7. Epub 2020 Mar 28.