PMID- 32778913 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20210701 LR - 20231112 IS - 1439-6327 (Electronic) IS - 1439-6319 (Print) IS - 1439-6319 (Linking) VI - 120 IP - 10 DP - 2020 Oct TI - Acute mechanical, physiological and perceptual responses in older men to traditional-set or different cluster-set configuration resistance training protocols. PG - 2311-2323 LID - 10.1007/s00421-020-04453-y [doi] AB - PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to compare mechanical outputs (i.e. power and impulse), physiological (i.e. heart rate) and perceptual (i.e. effort and fatigue) responses in older men to traditional-set or different cluster-set configuration resistance training protocols. METHODS: In a randomized cross-over design, 20 healthy old men (aged 67.2 +/- 2.1 years) completed four resistance training sessions using the back squat exercise loaded with optimal power loads. Training configurations were: traditional (TRA), three sets of six repetitions with 120-s rest between each set; Cluster-set 1 (CLU1), 24 single-repetition clusters with 10 s of rest after every cluster; Cluster-set 2 (CLU2), 12 double-repetition clusters with 20-s rest after every cluster; and Cluster-set 4 (CLU4), 6 quadruple-repetition clusters with 40-s rest after every cluster. RESULTS: Cluster-set configurations resulted in greater power outputs compared to traditional-set configuration (range 2.6-9.2%, all p [Formula: see text] 0.07 for main effect and protocol [Formula: see text] set interactions). CLU1 and CLU2 induced higher heart rate (range 7.1-10.5%, all p < 0.001 for main effect and protocol [Formula: see text] set interactions), lower rating of perceived exertion (range - 1.3 to - 3.2 AU, all p [Formula: see text] 0.006 for pairwise comparisons) and lower ratings of fatigue (range - 0.15 to - 4 AU, all p [Formula: see text] 0.012 for pairwise comparisons) compared to TRA and CLU4. Finally, an absolute preference for CLU2 was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Findings presented here support the prescription of CLU2 as an optimal resistance training configuration for trained older men using the back squat. FAU - Dello Iacono, Antonio AU - Dello Iacono A AUID- ORCID: 0000-0003-0204-0957 AD - University of the West of Scotland (School of Health and Life Sciences), Hamilton, UK. antonio.delloiacono@uws.ac.uk. FAU - Martone, Domenico AU - Martone D AUID- ORCID: 0000-0003-1967-1640 AD - Universita' Degli Studi di Napoli (Dipartimento di Science Motorie e Benessere), Naples, Italy. FAU - Hayes, Lawrence AU - Hayes L AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-6654-0072 AD - University of the West of Scotland (School of Health and Life Sciences), Hamilton, UK. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Randomized Controlled Trial DEP - 20200810 PL - Germany TA - Eur J Appl Physiol JT - European journal of applied physiology JID - 100954790 SB - IM MH - Aged MH - Aged, 80 and over MH - Aging/*physiology MH - *Exercise Tolerance MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Muscle Contraction MH - Muscle Fatigue MH - Perception MH - Resistance Training/adverse effects/*methods PMC - PMC7502068 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Elderly OT - Health OT - Power OT - Resistance training OT - Strength COIS- The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. EDAT- 2020/08/12 06:00 MHDA- 2021/07/02 06:00 PMCR- 2020/08/10 CRDT- 2020/08/12 06:00 PHST- 2020/03/22 00:00 [received] PHST- 2020/07/30 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2020/08/12 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2021/07/02 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2020/08/12 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2020/08/10 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.1007/s00421-020-04453-y [pii] AID - 4453 [pii] AID - 10.1007/s00421-020-04453-y [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020 Oct;120(10):2311-2323. doi: 10.1007/s00421-020-04453-y. Epub 2020 Aug 10.