PMID- 32926663 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20210624 LR - 20210624 IS - 2688-1535 (Electronic) IS - 2688-1527 (Linking) VI - 17 IP - 2 DP - 2021 Feb TI - Pilot Study of Patients' Preferences for Immediate Resection Versus a Watch and Wait Approach After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. PG - e149-e157 LID - 10.1200/OP.20.00158 [doi] AB - PURPOSE: In patients with rectal cancer who achieve a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, it may be reasonable to adopt a watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy rather than proceed to immediate resection of the rectum. Patient preferences for this strategy are unknown. The primary aim of the current study was to determine the feasibility of assessing hypothetical recurrence and survival differences that relevant patients would tolerate to avoid immediate resection of the rectum. A secondary aim included estimating patients' tolerance thresholds and the factors that might predict them. METHODS: We developed a study-specific written questionnaire based on a previously validated instrument. Hypothetical time tradeoff tasks were used to determine the recurrence rate patients would accept to adopt a W&W strategy and the survival benefit that would be needed to justify choosing immediate resection over W&W. Feasibility was measured on the basis of response rate, the stated ease of completion and the satisfaction of task, and time used. RESULTS: Twenty of 31 potentially eligible patients completed the study-specific questionnaire. The majority of respondents felt that questions were clear (70%) and not hard to understand (65%). The median acceptable recurrence risk to adopt a W&W strategy was 20% (interquartile range [IQR], 10%-35%). Patients required a median of 2.0 extra years of survival (IQR, 1.0-3.0 years) over a baseline 7.0 years, and they required a median extra 10% (IQR, 4%-19%) over baseline 70% survival rates to justify immediate resection. CONCLUSION: Measuring the preferences of patients with rectal cancer using time tradeoff methods seemed to be feasible. Larger studies are needed to confirm how acceptable a W&W strategy would be for relevant patients. FAU - Gunjur, Ashray AU - Gunjur A AD - Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Melbourne, NSW, Australia. FAU - Chazan, Grace AU - Chazan G AD - Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, NSW, Australia. FAU - Newnham, Genni AU - Newnham G AD - Oncology and Cancer Services, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, NSW, Australia. FAU - McLachlan, Sue-Anne AU - McLachlan SA AD - Oncology and Cancer Services, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, NSW, Australia. AD - Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, NSW, Australia. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20200914 PL - United States TA - JCO Oncol Pract JT - JCO oncology practice JID - 101758685 SB - IM MH - Humans MH - Neoadjuvant Therapy MH - Neoplasm Recurrence, Local MH - *Patient Preference MH - Pilot Projects MH - *Rectal Neoplasms/surgery MH - Rectum MH - Watchful Waiting EDAT- 2020/09/15 06:00 MHDA- 2021/06/25 06:00 CRDT- 2020/09/14 17:05 PHST- 2020/09/15 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2021/06/25 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2020/09/14 17:05 [entrez] AID - 10.1200/OP.20.00158 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Feb;17(2):e149-e157. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00158. Epub 2020 Sep 14.