PMID- 32940395 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20210830 LR - 20220418 IS - 1365-3164 (Electronic) IS - 0959-4493 (Linking) VI - 31 IP - 6 DP - 2020 Dec TI - Shortened immunotherapy dose-escalation saves time, but is it safe? A case-control study comparing the rates of adverse reactions between conventional and fast-escalation subcutaneous immunotherapy protocols during the induction phase. PG - 454-e120 LID - 10.1111/vde.12892 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only intervention believed to change the course of atopic diseases. As dogs appear to have fewer severe adverse events (AEs) compared to people receiving AIT, a prolonged dose-escalation induction phase might not be needed. OBJECTIVES: To report the incidence and characteristics of AEs induced by a fast-escalation subcutaneous immunotherapy (f-SCIT) protocol compared to a conventional (c-SCIT) regimen. ANIMALS: One hundred dogs treated with either f- SCIT (Centre 1, 50 dogs) or c-SCIT (Centre 2, 50 dogs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A case-control study retrospectively evaluating AEs during the induction of AIT. We determined the incidence and type of AEs in each SCIT group; we also assessed factors such as self-limitation and the need for AE-associated protocol changes. RESULTS: Twelve of 100 dogs (12%) developed a SCIT-attributable AE during the induction phase, with one dog having a local and 11 having systemic reactions (nine Grade I, two Grade II, none of grades III or IV). Dogs treated with the f-SCIT had a significantly higher rate of AEs (11 of 50; 22%) compared to those receiving the c-SCIT (one of 50; 2%). Most of the AEs (10 of 11; 91%) in the f-SCIT group were mild and self-limiting. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The induction phase of f-SCIT is simpler, and the maintenance phase is reached faster than that of the c-SCIT. Despite its higher rate of AEs than with the c-SCIT regimen, the majority of f-SCIT-associated AEs were mild and self-limiting. Whether or not this f-SCIT protocol leads to a faster time-to-efficacy needs to be determined. CI - (c) 2020 ESVD and ACVD. FAU - Herrmann, Ina AU - Herrmann I AUID- ORCID: 0000-0003-2772-9144 AD - Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, NC State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA. FAU - Loft, Klaus E AU - Loft KE AD - MSPCA Angell Memorial Hospital, 350 South Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02130, USA. FAU - Olivry, Thierry AU - Olivry T AUID- ORCID: 0000-0003-1399-0034 AD - Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, NC State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20200917 PL - England TA - Vet Dermatol JT - Veterinary dermatology JID - 9426187 RN - 0 (Allergens) SB - IM MH - *Allergens MH - Animals MH - Case-Control Studies MH - *Desensitization, Immunologic/veterinary MH - Dogs MH - Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary MH - Retrospective Studies EDAT- 2020/09/18 06:00 MHDA- 2021/08/31 06:00 CRDT- 2020/09/17 08:49 PHST- 2020/06/16 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2020/09/18 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2021/08/31 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2020/09/17 08:49 [entrez] AID - 10.1111/vde.12892 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Vet Dermatol. 2020 Dec;31(6):454-e120. doi: 10.1111/vde.12892. Epub 2020 Sep 17.