PMID- 32977442 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20201103 IS - 2077-0383 (Print) IS - 2077-0383 (Electronic) IS - 2077-0383 (Linking) VI - 9 IP - 10 DP - 2020 Sep 23 TI - Alcohol Septal Ablation versus Septal Myectomy Treatment of Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. LID - 10.3390/jcm9103062 [doi] LID - 3062 AB - Surgical myectomy (SM) and alcohol septal ablation (ASA) are two invasive therapies for symptomatic patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), despite medical therapy. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of the two procedures. We searched all electronic databases until February 2020 for clinical trials and cohorts comparing clinical outcomes of ASA and SM treatment of patients with HOCM. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, sudden cardiac death (SCD), re-intervention, and complications. Secondary endpoints included relief of clinical symptoms and drop of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient. Twenty studies (4547 patients; 2 CTs and 18 cohorts) comparing ASA vs. SM with a mean follow-up of 47 +/- 28.7 months were included. Long term (8.72 vs. 7.84%, p = 0.42) and short term (1.12 vs. 1.27%, p = 0.93) all-cause mortality, CV mortality (2.48 vs. 3.66%, p = 0.26), SCD (1.78 vs. 0.76%, p = 0.20) and stroke (0.36 vs. 1.01%, p = 0.64) were not different between procedures. ASA was associated with lower peri-procedural complications (5.57 vs. 10.5%, p = 0.04) but higher rate of re-interventions (10.1 vs. 0.27%; p < 0.001) and pacemaker dependency (12.4 vs. 4.31%, p = 0.0004) compared to SM. ASA resulted in less reduction in LVOT gradient (-47.8 vs. -58.4 mmHg, p = 0.01) and less improvement of clinical symptoms compared to SM (New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV, 82.4 vs. 94.5%, p < 0.001, angina 53.2 vs. 84.2%, p = 0.02). Thus, ASA and SM treatment of HOCM carry a similar risk of mortality. Peri-procedural complications are less in alcohol ablation but re-intervention and pacemaker implantations are more common. These results might impact the procedure choice in individual patients, for the best clinical outcome. FAU - Bytyci, Ibadete AU - Bytyci I AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-8996-4257 AD - Institute of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umea University, 90187 Umea, Sweden. AD - Universi College, Bardhosh, 10000 Prishtina, Kosovo. AD - Clinic of Cardiology, University Clinical Centre of Kosovo, 10000 Prishtina, Kosovo. FAU - Nistri, Stefano AU - Nistri S AD - Cardiology Service, CMSR-Veneto Medica, 204-36077 Altavilla Vicentina, Italy. FAU - Morner, Stellan AU - Morner S AD - Institute of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umea University, 90187 Umea, Sweden. FAU - Henein, Michael Y AU - Henein MY AD - Institute of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umea University, 90187 Umea, Sweden. AD - Molecular and Clinic Research Institute, St George University, Brunel University, London SW17 0QT, UK. AD - Institute of Fluid Dynamics, Brunel University, London UB8 3PH, UK. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Review DEP - 20200923 PL - Switzerland TA - J Clin Med JT - Journal of clinical medicine JID - 101606588 PMC - PMC7598206 OTO - NOTNLM OT - alcohol septal ablation OT - hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy OT - septal myectomy COIS- The authors declare no conflict of interest. EDAT- 2020/09/27 06:00 MHDA- 2020/09/27 06:01 PMCR- 2020/09/23 CRDT- 2020/09/26 01:00 PHST- 2020/08/13 00:00 [received] PHST- 2020/09/15 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2020/09/17 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2020/09/26 01:00 [entrez] PHST- 2020/09/27 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2020/09/27 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2020/09/23 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - jcm9103062 [pii] AID - jcm-09-03062 [pii] AID - 10.3390/jcm9103062 [doi] PST - epublish SO - J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 23;9(10):3062. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103062.