PMID- 33042194 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20201013 IS - 1664-462X (Print) IS - 1664-462X (Electronic) IS - 1664-462X (Linking) VI - 11 DP - 2020 TI - Modeling Light Response of Electron Transport Rate and Its Allocation for Ribulose Biphosphate Carboxylation and Oxygenation. PG - 581851 LID - 10.3389/fpls.2020.581851 [doi] LID - 581851 AB - Accurately describing the light response curve of electron transport rate (J-I curve) and allocation of electron flow for ribulose biphosphate (RuBP) carboxylation (J (C)-I curve) and that for oxygenation (J (O)-I curve) is fundamental for modeling of light relations of electron flow at the whole-plant and ecosystem scales. The non-rectangular hyperbolic model (hereafter, NH model) has been widely used to characterize light response of net photosynthesis rate (A (n); A (n)-I curve) and J-I curve. However, NH model has been reported to overestimate the maximum A (n) (A (nmax)) and the maximum J (J (max)), largely due to its asymptotic function. Meanwhile, few efforts have been delivered for describing J (C)-I and J (O)-I curves. The long-standing challenge on describing A (n)-I and J-I curves have been resolved by a recently developed A (n)-I and J-I models (hereafter, Ye model), which adopt a nonasymptotic function. To test whether Ye model can resolve the challenge of NH model in reproducing J-I, J (C)-I and J (O)-I curves over light-limited, light-saturated, and photoinhibitory I levels, we compared the performances of Ye model and NH model against measurements on two C(3) crops (Triticum aestivum L. and Glycine max L.) grown in field. The results showed that NH model significantly overestimated the A (nmax) and J (max) for both species, which can be accurately obtained by Ye model. Furthermore, NH model significantly overestimated the maximum electron flow for carboxylation (J (C-max)) but not the maximum electron flow for oxygenation (J (O-max)) for both species, disclosing the reason underlying the long-standing problem of NH model-overestimation of J (max) and A (nmax). CI - Copyright (c) 2020 Ye, Kang, An, Duan, Wang, Yang and Zhou. FAU - Ye, Zi-Piao AU - Ye ZP AD - Maths and Physics College, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, China. FAU - Kang, Hua-Jing AU - Kang HJ AD - Department of Landscape and Water Conservancy Engineering, Wenzhou Vocational College of Science and Technology, Wenzhou, China. FAU - An, Ting AU - An T AD - Maths and Physics College, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, China. FAU - Duan, Hong-Lang AU - Duan HL AD - Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Restoration of Degraded Ecosystems & Watershed Ecohydrology, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, China. FAU - Wang, Fu-Biao AU - Wang FB AD - Maths and Physics College, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, China. FAU - Yang, Xiao-Long AU - Yang XL AD - Maths and Physics College, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, China. FAU - Zhou, Shuang-Xi AU - Zhou SX AD - The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Hawke's Bay, New Zealand. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20200915 PL - Switzerland TA - Front Plant Sci JT - Frontiers in plant science JID - 101568200 PMC - PMC7522219 OTO - NOTNLM OT - electron flow partitioning OT - light response curve OT - maximum J OT - model OT - photosynthesis OT - ribulose biphosphate carboxylation OT - ribulose biphosphate oxygenation OT - saturation light intensity EDAT- 2020/10/13 06:00 MHDA- 2020/10/13 06:01 PMCR- 2020/01/01 CRDT- 2020/10/12 05:29 PHST- 2020/07/10 00:00 [received] PHST- 2020/08/25 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2020/10/12 05:29 [entrez] PHST- 2020/10/13 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2020/10/13 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2020/01/01 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.3389/fpls.2020.581851 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Front Plant Sci. 2020 Sep 15;11:581851. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.581851. eCollection 2020.