PMID- 33488783 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20220420 IS - 1758-8340 (Print) IS - 1758-8359 (Electronic) IS - 1758-8340 (Linking) VI - 12 DP - 2020 TI - Immune-checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy for treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PG - 1758835920983717 LID - 10.1177/1758835920983717 [doi] LID - 1758835920983717 AB - BACKGROUND: Multiple therapies including immune-checkpoint inhibitors are emerging as effective treatment for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSSC). However, the optimal first-line and second-line treatments remains controversial. METHODS: We systematically searched databases and conducted a systematic review of phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared two or more treatments for R/M HNSSC. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) ⩾3 with hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted and synthesized based on a frequentist network meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-six trials involving 8908 patients were included. Of first-line treatments, pembrolizumab plus cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil is associated with significantly improved OS (P-score = 0.91) and TPEx ranked first for prolonging PFS (0.91). EXTREME plus docetaxel (0.18) ranked lowest for AEs ⩾3. Of second-line treatments, nivolumab was the highest-ranked treatment for prolonging OS (0.95), while buparlisib plus paclitaxel was the highest-ranked treatment for PFS (0.94). Subgroup analyses suggested that nivolumab was significantly associated with improvement of OS in patients with high PD-L1 expression (HR 0.55, 0.43-0.70), whereas its OS benefit is similar with conventional chemotherapy for those with low PD-L1 expression. Buparlisib plus paclitaxel showed the best OS benefit in subgroups of patients with HPV-negative status, and with oral cavity or larynx as primary tumor sites. CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab plus cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil is likely to be the best first-line treatment when OS is a priority. Otherwise, TPEx should be the optimal first-line option due to its superior PFS prolongation efficacy, best safety profile, and similar OS benefit with pembrolizumab plus cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil. Nivolumab appears to be the best second-line option with best OS prolongation efficacy and outstanding safety profile in the overall population. Future RCTs with meticulous grouping of patients and detailed reporting are urgently needed for individualized treatment. CI - (c) The Author(s), 2020. FAU - Jin, Zhe AU - Jin Z AD - The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. FAU - Zhang, Bin AU - Zhang B AD - The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. FAU - Zhang, Lu AU - Zhang L AD - The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. FAU - Huang, Wenhui AU - Huang W AD - The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. FAU - Mo, Xiaokai AU - Mo X AD - The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. FAU - Chen, Qiuyin AU - Chen Q AD - The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. FAU - Wang, Fei AU - Wang F AD - The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. FAU - Chen, Zhuozhi AU - Chen Z AD - The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. FAU - Li, Minmin AU - Li M AD - The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. FAU - Zhang, Shuixing AU - Zhang S AUID- ORCID: 0000-0001-7377-382X AD - The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, No. 613, West Huangpu Avenue, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510630, PR China. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20201226 PL - England TA - Ther Adv Med Oncol JT - Therapeutic advances in medical oncology JID - 101510808 PMC - PMC7768319 OTO - NOTNLM OT - chemotherapy OT - immune-checkpoint inhibitor OT - network meta-analysis OT - recurrent or metastatic head and neck carcinoma COIS- Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. EDAT- 2021/01/26 06:00 MHDA- 2021/01/26 06:01 PMCR- 2020/12/26 CRDT- 2021/01/25 05:39 PHST- 2020/08/11 00:00 [received] PHST- 2020/12/01 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2021/01/25 05:39 [entrez] PHST- 2021/01/26 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2021/01/26 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2020/12/26 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.1177_1758835920983717 [pii] AID - 10.1177/1758835920983717 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020 Dec 26;12:1758835920983717. doi: 10.1177/1758835920983717. eCollection 2020.