PMID- 33576296 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20210309 LR - 20220420 IS - 1941-837X (Electronic) IS - 1369-6998 (Linking) VI - 24 IP - 1 DP - 2021 Jan-Dec TI - Real-world impact of brain metastases on healthcare utilization and costs in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR-TKIs in the US. PG - 328-338 LID - 10.1080/13696998.2021.1885418 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM) is difficult to treat and associated with poor survival. This study assessed the impact of BM on healthcare-related utilization and costs (HRUC) among patients receiving epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults newly-diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC, initiating first-/second-generation EGFR-TKI treatment, with BM or no BM (NBM), were identified retrospectively from IBM MarketScan healthcare claims databases (2013-2017). HRUC were measured during the variable-length follow-up period. Generalized linear models assessed the impact of BM on total healthcare costs, standardized to 2017 US$. RESULTS: Overall, 222 BM and 280 NBM patients were included, with a mean duration of follow-up of 14 months. Adjusted NSCLC-related and all-cause costs over average follow-up were 1.2 times higher among BM patients (Delta$5,640 and Delta$6,366, respectively; p <0.05); differences were driven primarily by radiation treatment and radiology. More than two times more BM than NBM patients received NSCLC-related radiation treatment, in both inpatient (15.3% vs 6.8%; p <0.05) and outpatient settings (87.8% vs 37.5%; p <0.05). Per-patient per-month (PPPM) radiation costs were also higher among BM patients, both inpatient ($796 vs $464, p =0.172) and outpatient ($2,443 vs $747, p <0.05). All-cause PPPM radiology visits (2.0 vs 1.3) and associated costs ($3,824 vs $1,621) were higher among BM patients (both p <0.05). CONCLUSION: NSCLC-related HRUC, especially those attributable to radiation treatment, were higher among patients with BM. Future research should compare the potential for CNS-active EGFR-TKIs vs first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs combined with radiotherapy to reduce HRUC. FAU - Kong, Amanda M AU - Kong AM AD - IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, USA. FAU - Pavilack, Melissa AU - Pavilack M AD - AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. FAU - Huo, Hairong AU - Huo H AD - AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. FAU - Shenolikar, Rahul AU - Shenolikar R AD - AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. FAU - Moynihan, Meghan AU - Moynihan M AD - IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, USA. FAU - Marchlewicz, Elizabeth H AU - Marchlewicz EH AD - IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, USA. FAU - Chebili-Larson, Christina AU - Chebili-Larson C AD - IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, USA. FAU - Min, Stella AU - Min S AD - IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, USA. FAU - Subramaniam, Deepa S AU - Subramaniam DS AD - AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. AD - Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PL - England TA - J Med Econ JT - Journal of medical economics JID - 9892255 RN - 0 (Antineoplastic Agents) RN - 0 (Protein Kinase Inhibitors) RN - EC 2.7.10.1 (ErbB Receptors) SB - IM MH - Age Factors MH - Aged MH - Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use MH - Brain Neoplasms/*economics/*secondary MH - Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy/*pathology MH - ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors MH - Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data MH - Health Resources/*economics/*statistics & numerical data MH - Humans MH - Insurance Claim Review MH - Lung Neoplasms/*pathology MH - Middle Aged MH - Models, Economic MH - Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use MH - Sex Factors MH - Socioeconomic Factors OTO - NOTNLM OT - I OT - Non-small cell lung cancer OT - Z OT - brain tumors OT - epidermal growth factor receptor OT - healthcare costs EDAT- 2021/02/13 06:00 MHDA- 2021/03/10 06:00 CRDT- 2021/02/12 08:39 PHST- 2021/02/13 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2021/03/10 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2021/02/12 08:39 [entrez] AID - 10.1080/13696998.2021.1885418 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):328-338. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1885418.