PMID- 33791602 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20230919 IS - 2631-4797 (Electronic) IS - 2631-4797 (Linking) VI - 1 IP - 1 DP - 2019 Mar TI - Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Early Outcomes and Analysis of Postoperative Pain. PG - ojz006 LID - 10.1093/asjof/ojz006 [doi] LID - ojz006 AB - BACKGROUND: Direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction provides high-quality aesthetic results in appropriate candidates. Most commonly, implants are placed in the subpectoral space which can lead to pain and breast animation. Surgical and technological advances have allowed for successful prepectoral implant placement which may eliminate these trade-offs. OBJECTIVES: Here we present early outcomes from 153 reconstructions in 94 patients who underwent prepectoral DTI. We sought to determine whether these patients have less postoperative pain and narcotic use than subpectoral implant or expander placement. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for all prepectoral DTI reconstructions at our institution from 2015 to 2016. Data were collected on postoperative pain and narcotic use while in hospital. RESULTS: The average follow-up time was 8.5 months (range, 3-17 months) and the overall complication rate was 27% (n = 41) with the most common complications being skin necrosis (9%, n = 13) and infection (7%, n = 11). No statistically significant difference in complications was found in patients who underwent postmastectomy radiation therapy. Patients who underwent prepectoral DTI reconstruction did not have a statistically significant difference in postoperative pain and narcotic use while in-hospital compared with other techniques. CONCLUSION: Prepectoral DTI reconstruction provides good results with similar complication rates to subpectoral techniques. Prepectoral DTI eliminates the problem of breast animation. Although our series did not reach statistical significance in pain scores or requirement for postoperative narcotics, we believe that it is an important preliminary result and with larger numbers we anticipate a more definitive conclusion. CI - (c) 2019 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. FAU - Fredman, Rafi AU - Fredman R AD - Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. FAU - Wu, Cindy AU - Wu C AD - Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. FAU - Rapolti, Mihaela AU - Rapolti M AD - Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. FAU - Luckett, Daniel AU - Luckett D AD - Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. FAU - Fine, Jason AU - Fine J AD - Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. FAU - McGuire, Kandace AU - McGuire K AD - Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. FAU - Gallagher, Kristalyn AU - Gallagher K AD - Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. FAU - Roughton, Michelle AU - Roughton M AD - Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20190227 PL - England TA - Aesthet Surg J Open Forum JT - Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum JID - 101771713 PMC - PMC7984832 EDAT- 2019/02/27 00:00 MHDA- 2019/02/27 00:01 PMCR- 2019/02/27 CRDT- 2021/04/01 06:34 PHST- 2021/04/01 06:34 [entrez] PHST- 2019/02/27 00:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2019/02/27 00:01 [medline] PHST- 2019/02/27 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - ojz006 [pii] AID - 10.1093/asjof/ojz006 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2019 Feb 27;1(1):ojz006. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojz006. eCollection 2019 Mar.