PMID- 33951124 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20220114 LR - 20220114 IS - 1842-1121 (Electronic) IS - 1841-8724 (Linking) VI - 30 IP - 2 DP - 2021 Jun 18 TI - Comparison of Four Bowel Cleansing Agents for Colonoscopy and the Factors Affecting their Efficacy. A Prospective, Randomized Study. PG - 213-220 LID - 10.15403/jgld-3401 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adequate bowel preparation is essential for successful and effective colonoscopy. Several types of cleansing agents are currently available including low-volume solutions. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of four different bowel cleansing agents. METHODS: A single-center, prospective, randomized, and single-blind study was performed. Consecutive patients referred for colonoscopy were enrolled and randomized into one of the following types of laxatives: polyethylenglycol 4L (PEG), oral sulfate solution (OSS), 2L polyethylenglycol + ascorbate (2L-PEG/Asc), or magnesium citrate + sodium picosulfate (MCSP). The primary outcome was quality of bowel cleansing evaluated according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Secondary outcomes were polyp detection rate (PDR) and tolerability. RESULTS: Final analysis was performed on 431 patients. The number of patients with adequate bowel preparation (BBPS total scores >/=6 and sub scores >/=2 in each segment) was not significantly different throughout all groups (95.4% PEG; 94.6% OSS; 96.3% 2L-PEG/Asc; 96.2% MCSP; p=0.955). Excellent bowel preparation (BBPS total scores >/= 8) was associated with younger age (p=0.007). The groups did not have significantly different PDRs (49.5% PEG; 49.1% OSS; 38% 2L-PEG/Asc; 40.4% MCSP; p=0.201). The strongest predictors of pathology identification were age and male gender. The best-tolerated solution was MCSP (palatability: p<0.001; nausea: p=0.024). FAU - Kmochova, Klara AU - Kmochova K AD - Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. . klara.kmochova@uvn.cz. FAU - Grega, Tomas AU - Grega T AD - Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. tomas.grega@uvn.cz. FAU - Ngo, Ondrej AU - Ngo O AD - Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. ngo@iba.muni.cz. FAU - Vojtechova, Gabriela AU - Vojtechova G AD - Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. gabriela.vojtechova@uvn.cz. FAU - Majek, Ondrej AU - Majek O AD - Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. majek@iba.muni.cz. FAU - Urbanek, Petr AU - Urbanek P AD - Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. petr.urbanek@uvn.cz. FAU - Zavoral, Miroslav AU - Zavoral M AD - Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. miroslav.zavoral@uvn.cz. FAU - Suchanek, Stepan AU - Suchanek S AD - Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. stepan.suchanek@uvn.cz. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Randomized Controlled Trial DEP - 20210618 PL - Romania TA - J Gastrointestin Liver Dis JT - Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD JID - 101272825 RN - 0 (Cathartics) RN - 0 (Detergents) RN - 3WJQ0SDW1A (Polyethylene Glycols) SB - IM MH - *Cathartics/adverse effects MH - Colonoscopy MH - *Detergents MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Polyethylene Glycols/adverse effects MH - Prospective Studies MH - Single-Blind Method EDAT- 2021/05/06 06:00 MHDA- 2022/01/15 06:00 CRDT- 2021/05/05 17:48 PHST- 2021/05/06 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2022/01/15 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2021/05/05 17:48 [entrez] AID - 10.15403/jgld-3401 [doi] PST - epublish SO - J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2021 Jun 18;30(2):213-220. doi: 10.15403/jgld-3401.