PMID- 33996152 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20220423 IS - 2090-0384 (Print) IS - 2090-0392 (Electronic) VI - 2021 DP - 2021 TI - Efficacy of ARB/HCTZ Combination Therapy in Uncontrolled Hypertensive Patients Compared with ARB Monotherapy: A Meta-Analysis. PG - 6670183 LID - 10.1155/2021/6670183 [doi] LID - 6670183 AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of combination of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) compared to ARB alone in patients with uncontrolled hypertension via a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched databases till July 2019 using relevant search terms. We included articles that were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ARB/HCTZ with ARB for a duration of at least 4 weeks and reported on the efficacy or safety. Meta-analyses for efficacy outcomes were performed. In addition, groups given different concentrations of HCTZ (12.5 and 25 mg) were analysed separately. RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs (12,055 participants) were included. Overall, ARB/HCTZ combination therapy (both 12.5 and 25 mg HCTZ combination) resulted in better sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure control than ARB alone (mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI): -5.69 [-6.66, -4.73] for 12.5 mg and -9.10 [-11.78, -6.42] for 25 mg and mean difference (95% CI): -2.91 [-3.31, -2.51] for 12.5 mg and -4.16 [-4.75, -3.58] for 25 mg). ARB/HCTZ combination therapy resulted in a higher rate of target blood pressure achievement compared to ARB alone (risk ratio (95% CI): 1.50 [1.42, 1.59]). ARB/HCTZ combination therapy had similar rates of total adverse events (AEs) and severe AEs compared to ARB alone. CONCLUSION: ARB/HCTZ combination therapy is more efficacious for controlling blood pressure, and combination with a low concentration of HCTZ has similar AEs compared to ARB alone. Clinicians should consider adding HCTZ in the medication regime of patients with uncontrolled hypertension using ARB, if their clinical profile allows. CI - Copyright (c) 2021 Linlin Ma et al. FAU - Ma, Linlin AU - Ma L AD - Department of Hypertension, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. FAU - Zheng, Keyang AU - Zheng K AD - Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. FAU - Yan, Jiafu AU - Yan J AD - Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. FAU - Cheng, Wenli AU - Cheng W AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-3176-0227 AD - Department of Hypertension, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20210427 PL - United States TA - Int J Hypertens JT - International journal of hypertension JID - 101538881 PMC - PMC8096582 COIS- The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. EDAT- 2021/05/18 06:00 MHDA- 2021/05/18 06:01 PMCR- 2021/04/27 CRDT- 2021/05/17 06:11 PHST- 2020/10/26 00:00 [received] PHST- 2021/04/01 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2021/05/17 06:11 [entrez] PHST- 2021/05/18 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2021/05/18 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2021/04/27 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.1155/2021/6670183 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Int J Hypertens. 2021 Apr 27;2021:6670183. doi: 10.1155/2021/6670183. eCollection 2021.