PMID- 33998669 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20210617 LR - 20220716 IS - 1469-493X (Electronic) IS - 1361-6137 (Linking) VI - 5 IP - 5 DP - 2021 May 17 TI - Single-dose intravenous ketorolac for acute postoperative pain in adults. PG - CD013263 LID - 10.1002/14651858.CD013263.pub2 [doi] LID - CD013263 AB - BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain is common and may be severe. Postoperative administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduces patient opioid requirements and, in turn, may reduce the incidence and severity of opioid-induced adverse events (AEs). OBJECTIVES: To assess the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of single-dose intravenous ketorolac, compared with placebo or an active comparator, for moderate to severe postoperative pain in adults. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases without language restrictions: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS on 20 April 2020. We checked clinical trials registers and reference lists of retrieved articles for additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized double-blind trials that compared a single postoperative dose of intravenous ketorolac with placebo or another active treatment, for treating acute postoperative pain in adults following any surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcome was the number of participants in each arm achieving at least 50% pain relief over a four- and six-hour period. Our secondary outcomes were time to and number of participants using rescue medication; withdrawals due to lack of efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and for any other cause; and number of participants experiencing any AE, serious AEs (SAEs), and NSAID-related or opioid-related AEs. For subgroup analysis, we planned to analyze different doses of parenteral ketorolac separately and to analyze results based on the type of surgery performed. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 12 studies, involving 1905 participants undergoing various surgeries (pelvic/abdominal, dental, and orthopedic), with 17 to 83 participants receiving intravenous ketorolac in each study. Mean study population ages ranged from 22.5 years to 67.4 years. Most studies administered a dose of ketorolac of 30 mg; one study assessed 15 mg, and another administered 60 mg. Most studies had an unclear risk of bias for some domains, particularly allocation concealment and blinding, and a high risk of bias due to small sample size. The overall certainty of evidence for each outcome ranged from very low to moderate. Reasons for downgrading certainty included serious study limitations, inconsistency and imprecision. Ketorolac versus placebo Very low-certainty evidence from eight studies (658 participants) suggests that ketorolac results in a large increase in the number of participants achieving at least 50% pain relief over four hours compared to placebo, but the evidence is very uncertain (risk ratio (RR) 2.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80 to 4.37). The number needed to treat for one additional participant to benefit (NNTB) was 2.4 (95% CI 1.8 to 3.7). Low-certainty evidence from 10 studies (914 participants) demonstrates that ketorolac may result in a large increase in the number of participants achieving at least 50% pain relief over six hours compared to placebo (RR 3.26, 95% CI 1.93 to 5.51). The NNTB was 2.5 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.7). Among secondary outcomes, for time to rescue medication, moderate-certainty evidence comparing intravenous ketorolac versus placebo demonstrated a mean median of 271 minutes for ketorolac versus 104 minutes for placebo (6 studies, 633 participants). For the number of participants using rescue medication, very low-certainty evidence from five studies (417 participants) compared ketorolac with placebo. The RR was 0.60 (95% CI 0.36 to 1.00), that is, it did not demonstrate a difference between groups. Ketorolac probably results in a slight increase in total adverse event rates compared with placebo (74% versus 65%; 8 studies, 810 participants; RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.19; number needed to treat for an additional harmful event (NNTH) 16.7, 95% CI 8.3 to infinite, moderate-certainty evidence). Serious AEs were rare. Low-certainty evidence from eight studies (703 participants) did not demonstrate a difference in rates between ketorolac and placebo (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.13 to 3.03). Ketorolac versus NSAIDs Ketorolac was compared to parecoxib in four studies and diclofenac in two studies. For our primary outcome, over both four and six hours there was no evidence of a difference between intravenous ketorolac and another NSAID (low-certainty and moderate-certainty evidence, respectively). Over four hours, four studies (337 participants) produced an RR of 1.04 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.21) and over six hours, six studies (603 participants) produced an RR of 1.06 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.19). For time to rescue medication, low-certainty evidence from four studies (427 participants) suggested that participants receiving ketorolac waited an extra 35 minutes (mean median 331 minutes versus 296 minutes). For the number of participants using rescue medication, very low-certainty evidence from three studies (260 participants) compared ketorolac with another NSAID. The RR was 0.90 (95% CI 0.58 to 1.40), that is, there may be little or no difference between groups. Ketorolac probably results in a slight increase in total adverse event rates compared with another NSAID (76% versus 68%, 5 studies, 516 participants; RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.23; NNTH 12.5, 95% CI 6.7 to infinite, moderate-certainty evidence). Serious AEs were rare. Low-certainty evidence from five studies (530 participants) did not demonstrate a difference in rates between ketorolac and another NSAID (RR 3.18, 95% CI 0.13 to 76.99). Only one of the five studies reported a single serious AE. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The amount and certainty of evidence for the use of intravenous ketorolac as a treatment for postoperative pain varies across efficacy and safety outcomes and amongst comparators, from very low to moderate. The available evidence indicates that postoperative intravenous ketorolac administration may offer substantial pain relief for most patients, but further research may impact this estimate. Adverse events appear to occur at a slightly higher rate in comparison to placebo and to other NSAIDs. Insufficient information is available to assess whether intravenous ketorolac has a different rate of gastrointestinal or surgical-site bleeding, renal dysfunction, or cardiovascular events versus other NSAIDs. There was a lack of studies in cardiovascular surgeries and in elderly populations who may be at increased risk for adverse events. CI - Copyright (c) 2021 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. FAU - McNicol, Ewan D AU - McNicol ED AD - Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. FAU - Ferguson, McKenzie C AU - Ferguson MC AD - Pharmacy Practice, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL, USA. FAU - Schumann, Roman AU - Schumann R AD - Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, Massachusetts, USA. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Meta-Analysis PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't PT - Systematic Review DEP - 20210517 PL - England TA - Cochrane Database Syst Rev JT - The Cochrane database of systematic reviews JID - 100909747 RN - 0 (Analgesics, Opioid) RN - 0 (Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal) RN - 0 (Isoxazoles) RN - 0 (Placebos) RN - 144O8QL0L1 (Diclofenac) RN - 9TUW81Y3CE (parecoxib) RN - YZI5105V0L (Ketorolac) SB - IM UOF - doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013263 MH - Acute Pain/*drug therapy MH - Adult MH - Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage/adverse effects MH - Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/*administration & dosage/adverse effects MH - Bias MH - Diclofenac/administration & dosage MH - Humans MH - Injections, Intravenous MH - Isoxazoles/administration & dosage MH - Ketorolac/*administration & dosage/adverse effects MH - Middle Aged MH - Numbers Needed To Treat MH - Pain, Postoperative/*drug therapy MH - Placebos/therapeutic use MH - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic MH - Time Factors MH - Young Adult PMC - PMC8127532 COIS- EM: none known. EM is a pharmacist with a Master's degree in Pain Research, Education and Policy, and manages people with acute pain. MF: none known. RS: none known. RS is an anesthesiologist whose practice includes acute perioperative pain management. EDAT- 2021/05/18 06:00 MHDA- 2021/06/22 06:00 PMCR- 2022/05/17 CRDT- 2021/05/17 08:54 PHST- 2021/05/17 08:54 [entrez] PHST- 2021/05/18 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2021/06/22 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2022/05/17 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - CD013263.pub2 [pii] AID - 10.1002/14651858.CD013263.pub2 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 17;5(5):CD013263. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013263.pub2.