PMID- 34012890
OWN - NLM
STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE
LR  - 20210522
IS  - 2222-3959 (Print)
IS  - 2227-4898 (Electronic)
IS  - 2222-3959 (Linking)
VI  - 14
IP  - 5
DP  - 2021
TI  - Optical and visual quality comparison of implantable collamer lens and 
      femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia 
      correction.
PG  - 737-743
LID - 10.18240/ijo.2021.05.15 [doi]
AB  - AIM: To compare clinical outcomes and refractive stability of implantable 
      collamer lens (ICL) implantation and femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ 
      keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for high myopia correction. METHODS: The Optical 
      Quality Analysis System (OQAS) was used to evaluate clinical outcomes objectively 
      after operation for high myopia correction. We compared the two procedures in 
      terms of 1-year changes in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected 
      distance visual acuity (CDVA), safety index, efficacy index, spherical 
      equivalent, modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff frequency, strehl ratio 
      (SR) and objective scatter index (OSI). RESULTS: At 1y postoperatively, the 
      safety indices were 1.33+/-0.27 in ICL group, and 1.17+/-0.24 in FS-LASIK group. 
      39.58% in the ICL group and 27.59% in the FS-LASIK group gained CDVA in 2 lines 
      or better than that in preoperative CDVA. The efficacy indices were 1.28+/-0.22 in 
      ICL group, and 1.13+/-0.26 in FS-LASIK group. The changes of spherical equivalent 
      from 1wk to 1y postoperatively was -0.12+/-0.37 D in ICL group, and -0.79+/-0.58 D in 
      FS-LASIK group (P<0.05). Spherical equivalent within +/-0.50 D was achieved in 
      97.92% in ICL group and 68.97% in FS-LASIK group. MTF cutoff frequency were 
      higher with ICL as compared to FS-LASIK (P<0.05) at each postoperative follow-up 
      stage; for postoperative 1mo later, SR was statistically significant difference 
      between two groups (P<0.05); with no statistically significant difference in OSI 
      between two groups (P>0.05) in postoperative 3mo later. CONCLUSION: ICL 
      implantation and FS-LASIK procedures both provide good safety and predictability 
      in high myopia correction. ICL implantation provides better clinical outcomes and 
      refractive stability than FS-LASIK.
CI  - International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.
FAU - Jiang, Zheng
AU  - Jiang Z
AD  - Medical College, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410006, Hunan Province, China.
FAU - Wang, Hua
AU  - Wang H
AD  - Center for Ophthalmic Optics, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital; the First 
      Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410005, Hunan Province, 
      China.
FAU - Luo, Dong-Qiang
AU  - Luo DQ
AD  - Center for Ophthalmic Optics, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital; the First 
      Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410005, Hunan Province, 
      China.
FAU - Chen, Jiao
AU  - Chen J
AD  - Center for Ophthalmic Optics, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital; the First 
      Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410005, Hunan Province, 
      China.
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
DEP - 20210518
PL  - China
TA  - Int J Ophthalmol
JT  - International journal of ophthalmology
JID - 101553860
PMC - PMC8077018
OTO - NOTNLM
OT  - femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis
OT  - high myopia
OT  - implantable collamer lens implantation
OT  - refractive stability
EDAT- 2021/05/21 06:00
MHDA- 2021/05/21 06:01
PMCR- 2021/05/18
CRDT- 2021/05/20 06:45
PHST- 2020/01/09 00:00 [received]
PHST- 2021/01/29 00:00 [accepted]
PHST- 2021/05/20 06:45 [entrez]
PHST- 2021/05/21 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2021/05/21 06:01 [medline]
PHST- 2021/05/18 00:00 [pmc-release]
AID - ijo-14-05-737 [pii]
AID - 10.18240/ijo.2021.05.15 [doi]
PST - epublish
SO  - Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 May 18;14(5):737-743. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.05.15. 
      eCollection 2021.