PMID- 34345850 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20240403 IS - 2666-027X (Electronic) IS - 2666-027X (Linking) VI - 2 DP - 2021 TI - Interpretation of murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) data for skin sensitization: Overload effects, danger signals and chemistry-based read-across. PG - 53-63 LID - 10.1016/j.crtox.2021.01.004 [doi] AB - There is a large body of information on testing of chemicals for skin sensitization in the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA), in which potency is quantified by the EC3 value, derived from dose-response data. This information finds use in risk assessment and regulatory classification, and also in assessing the performance of non-animal methods. However, some LLNA results are not straightforward to interpret, and in some cases published EC3 values are questionable. These cases usually arise where the dose-response does not show a monotonic increasing pattern but is bell-shaped, or shows a decrease in response with increasing dose over the whole dose range tested. By analogy with a long-recognised phenomenon in guinea pig sensitization, this is referred to as the overload effect. Here a mechanistic rationale is presented to explain the overload effect, and at the same time to explain the production of danger signals even when the sensitizer is non-irritant. Some illustrative examples are presented where the overload effect can lead to misinterpretation of LLNA results, and chemistry-based read-across is applied to reinterpret the data. CI - (c) 2021 The Author(s). FAU - Roberts, David W AU - Roberts DW AD - School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool L3 3AF, England, United Kingdom. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20210121 PL - Netherlands TA - Curr Res Toxicol JT - Current research in toxicology JID - 101771915 PMC - PMC8320616 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Chemistry-based read-across OT - Danger signal OT - LLNA OT - Non-animal methods OT - Overload effect COIS- The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. EDAT- 2021/08/05 06:00 MHDA- 2021/08/05 06:01 PMCR- 2021/01/21 CRDT- 2021/08/04 07:12 PHST- 2020/12/10 00:00 [received] PHST- 2021/01/11 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2021/01/14 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2021/08/04 07:12 [entrez] PHST- 2021/08/05 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2021/08/05 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2021/01/21 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - S2666-027X(21)00004-9 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.crtox.2021.01.004 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Curr Res Toxicol. 2021 Jan 21;2:53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.crtox.2021.01.004. eCollection 2021.