PMID- 34474447 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20211213 LR - 20231020 IS - 1528-1159 (Electronic) IS - 0362-2436 (Linking) VI - 47 IP - 1 DP - 2022 Jan 1 TI - The Clinical Relevance of the Cervical Disc Prosthesis: Combining Clinical Results of Two RCTs. PG - 67-75 LID - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004113 [doi] AB - STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis was performed on data from 251 patients that were included in two randomized, double-blinded clinical trials comparing clinical results of anterior cervical discectomy and arthroplasty (ACDA) to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and anterior cervical discectomy (ACD), for single-level disc herniation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether the ACDA procedure offers superior clinical results 2 years after surgery, to either ACDF or ACD without instrumentation, in the entire group of patients or in a particular subgroup of patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The cervical disc prosthesis was introduced to provide superior clinical outcomes after ACD. METHODS: Neck Disability Index (NDI), and subscales of the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) and McGill pain score were collected at baseline, 1 year and 2 years after surgery. Reoperations and complications were also evaluated. A preliminary subgroup analysis was performed for age, disc height, body mass index (BMI), smoking, and sex. RESULTS: The NDI decreased comparably in all treatment arms to circa 50% of the baseline value and marginal mean NDI differences varied from 0.4 to 1.1 on a 100 point NDI scale, with confidence intervals never exceeding the 20-point minimal clinical important difference (MCID). Secondary outcome parameters showed comparable results. Preliminary subgroup analysis could not demonstrate clinically relevant differences in NDI between treatments after 2 years. CONCLUSION: After combining data from two Randomized Controlled Trials it can be concluded that there is no clinical benefit for ACDA, when compared with ACDF or ACD 2 years after surgery. Preliminary subgroup analysis indicated outcomes were similar between treatment groups, and that no subgroup could be appointed that benefited more from either ACD, ACDF, or ACDA.Level of Evidence: 1. CI - Copyright (c) 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - Goedmakers, Caroline M W AU - Goedmakers CMW AD - Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. AD - Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center (CNOC), Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. FAU - Bartels, Ronald H M A AU - Bartels RHMA AD - Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. FAU - Donk, Roland D AU - Donk RD AD - Department of Orthopaedics, Via Sana Clinics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. FAU - Arts, Mark P AU - Arts MP AD - Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, the Hague, the Netherlands. FAU - van Zwet, Erik W AU - van Zwet EW AD - Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. FAU - Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen L A AU - Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA AD - Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Randomized Controlled Trial PL - United States TA - Spine (Phila Pa 1976) JT - Spine JID - 7610646 SB - IM CIN - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 May 1;47(9):E432-E433. PMID: 35533297 MH - Cervical Vertebrae/surgery MH - Diskectomy/adverse effects MH - Double-Blind Method MH - Humans MH - *Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery MH - *Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery MH - Prostheses and Implants MH - Retrospective Studies MH - *Spinal Fusion/adverse effects MH - *Total Disc Replacement/adverse effects MH - Treatment Outcome EDAT- 2021/09/03 06:00 MHDA- 2021/12/15 06:00 CRDT- 2021/09/02 20:30 PHST- 2021/09/03 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2021/12/15 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2021/09/02 20:30 [entrez] AID - 00007632-202201010-00013 [pii] AID - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004113 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Jan 1;47(1):67-75. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004113.