PMID- 34554888 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20220113 LR - 20220113 IS - 1526-2359 (Electronic) IS - 1073-2748 (Print) IS - 1073-2748 (Linking) VI - 28 DP - 2021 Jan-Dec TI - Network Meta-analysis of First-Line Systemic Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. PG - 10732748211033497 LID - 10.1177/10732748211033497 [doi] LID - 10732748211033497 AB - PURPOSE: To assess the relative efficacy and safety of first-line systemic therapies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A comprehensive literature review was conducted including MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials for phase II or III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to and including July 15, 2019. We included RCTs in which at least 1 intervention was either chemotherapeutic agents (such as fluorouracil, irinotecan, or oxaliplatin) or antibodies targeting angiogenesis (such as bevacizumab) or agents that act on the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway (such as cetuximab and panitumumab) or studies reported at least one of the following outcomes: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and/or Grade 3 + adverse events (AEs). Using a random effect model, we performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to analyze the probability of optimal therapeutic regime obtained from direct comparisons with indirect evidences. We estimated hazard ratios for OS and PFS. RESULTS: A total of 30 RCTs comprising 12,146 mCRC patients with 25 different treatment strategies were included. The triple combination FOLFOXIRI [fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan] plus bevacizumab provided significant survival benefits with improved OS over all other treatments. The network meta-analysis also indicated a significant advantage of using FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in comparison to other treatment strategies for PFS. Besides, FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab was associated with the well-tolerated adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supported the use of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as the best first-line regimen and potentially effective and safe strategy for the management of patients with mCRC. FAU - Xu, Shan AU - Xu S AUID- ORCID: 0000-0003-0754-0969 AD - Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, Germany. FAU - Sak, Ali AU - Sak A AD - Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, Germany. FAU - Erol, Yasin Bahadir AU - Erol YB AD - Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, Germany. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Meta-Analysis PL - United States TA - Cancer Control JT - Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center JID - 9438457 RN - 0 (Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological) SB - IM MH - Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*therapeutic use MH - Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage/adverse effects/*therapeutic use MH - Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic MH - Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic MH - Colorectal Neoplasms/*drug therapy/mortality/*pathology MH - Humans MH - Interatrial Block MH - Network Meta-Analysis MH - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic MH - Survival Analysis PMC - PMC8474314 COIS- Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. EDAT- 2021/09/24 06:00 MHDA- 2022/01/14 06:00 PMCR- 2021/09/23 CRDT- 2021/09/23 17:16 PHST- 2021/09/23 17:16 [entrez] PHST- 2021/09/24 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2022/01/14 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2021/09/23 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.1177_10732748211033497 [pii] AID - 10.1177/10732748211033497 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Cancer Control. 2021 Jan-Dec;28:10732748211033497. doi: 10.1177/10732748211033497.