PMID- 34711448 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20220321 LR - 20220321 IS - 1531-6564 (Electronic) IS - 0363-5023 (Linking) VI - 47 IP - 2 DP - 2022 Feb TI - Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference in Patients Following Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture. PG - 137-144 LID - S0363-5023(21)00600-6 [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.08.025 [doi] AB - PURPOSE: We estimated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) computer adaptive tests (CATs) following surgical treatment of distal radius fracture (DRF). METHODS: Adult patients surgically treated between November 2017 and November 2020 for isolated DRF were identified. Demographic and patient-reported outcome data were extracted from the electronic health record. Outcomes of interest were the PROMIS PF and PI CATs. Inclusion criteria were met if: (1) PROMIS PF and PI scores were available at preoperative and postoperative visits; and (2) a postoperative clinical anchor question asking about overall response to treatment was answered. An anchor-based MCID estimate was determined by calculating the average absolute score change in PROMIS PF and PI for patients who indicated a mild change to the anchor question. A distribution-based MCID estimate was also calculated using the standard error of measurement and effect sizes of change. RESULTS: The changes in PROMIS PF and PI scores were significantly different between patients who gave responses of much change (n = 73), mild change (n = 51), and no change (n = 19) to the clinical anchor question. The average score changes in the mild change group for PROMIS PF and PI were 5.2 (SD, 3.7) and 6.8 (SD, 4.3) points, respectively, representing the anchor-based MCID estimates. The PROMIS PI anchor-based estimate was moderately correlated with the preoperative score (r = -0.41), time between visits (r = -0.39), and age (r = 0.30). The distribution-based MCID estimates were 3.8 (SD, 1.3) and 3.7 (SD, 1.3) points for the PROMIS PF and PI, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The MCIDs were estimated as 5.2 and 6.8 for the PROMIS PF and PI CATs, respectively, following surgery for DRF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As reports continue to publish a consistent range of MCID values, researchers can be confident in these values and begin using them across a broader spectrum of conditions treated by hand surgeons. CI - Copyright (c) 2022 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - Hollenberg, Alex M AU - Hollenberg AM AD - Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY. FAU - Hammert, Warren C AU - Hammert WC AD - Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY. Electronic address: Warren_Hammert@urmc.rochester.edu. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20211026 PL - United States TA - J Hand Surg Am JT - The Journal of hand surgery JID - 7609631 SB - IM MH - Computers MH - Humans MH - *Minimal Clinically Important Difference MH - Pain MH - Patient Reported Outcome Measures MH - *Radius Fractures/surgery OTO - NOTNLM OT - Distal radius fracture OT - MCID OT - PROMIS OT - minimal clinically important difference OT - patient-reported outcomes EDAT- 2021/10/30 06:00 MHDA- 2022/03/22 06:00 CRDT- 2021/10/29 05:43 PHST- 2021/02/27 00:00 [received] PHST- 2021/08/05 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2021/08/19 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2021/10/30 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2022/03/22 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2021/10/29 05:43 [entrez] AID - S0363-5023(21)00600-6 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.08.025 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Feb;47(2):137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.08.025. Epub 2021 Oct 26.