PMID- 34714524 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20211125 IS - 1869-6953 (Print) IS - 1869-6961 (Electronic) IS - 1869-6961 (Linking) VI - 12 IP - 12 DP - 2021 Dec TI - Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus iDegLira in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled by GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Oral Antihyperglycemic Therapy. PG - 3231-3241 LID - 10.1007/s13300-021-01156-1 [doi] AB - INTRODUCTION: The fixed-ratio combinations (FRCs) of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and basal insulin, insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide (iGlarLixi), and insulin degludec plus liraglutide (iDegLira), have demonstrated safety and efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled on GLP-1 RAs. However, a comparative cost-effectiveness analysis between these FRCs from a UK Health Service perspective has not been conducted. METHODS: The IQVIA Core Diabetes Model was used to estimate lifetime costs and outcomes in patients with T2DM receiving iGlarLixi (based on the LixiLan-G trial) versus iDegLira (based on relative treatment effects from an indirect treatment comparison using data from DUAL III). Utilities, medical costs, and costs of diabetes-related complications were derived from literature. Model outputs included costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated with a local willingness-to-pay threshold of pound20,000 per QALY. Extensive scenario, one-way sensitivity, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the model. RESULTS: iGlarLixi was less costly (iGlarLixi, pound30,011; iDegLira, pound40,742), owing to lower acquisition costs, and similar in terms of QALYs gained (iGlarLixi, 8.437; iDegLira, 8.422). Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses supported the base case findings. CONCLUSION: In patients with T2DM and inadequate glycemic control despite GLP-1 RAs, use of iGlarLixi was associated with substantial cost savings and comparable utility outcomes. iGlarLixi can be considered as cost-effective versus iDegLira from the UK Health Service perspective. CI - (c) 2021. The Author(s). FAU - McCrimmon, Rory J AU - McCrimmon RJ AD - School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. FAU - Lamotte, Mark AU - Lamotte M AD - IQVIA Global HEOR, Zaventem, Belgium. FAU - Ramos, Mafalda AU - Ramos M AD - IQVIA Global HEOR, Porto Salvo, Portugal. FAU - Alsaleh, Abdul Jabbar Omar AU - Alsaleh AJO AD - Department of Economics, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. FAU - Souhami, Elisabeth AU - Souhami E AD - Sanofi, Paris, France. FAU - Lew, Elisheva AU - Lew E AD - Sanofi, Paris, France. Elisheva.Lew@sanofi.com. LA - eng GR - WT_/Wellcome Trust/United Kingdom PT - Journal Article DEP - 20211029 PL - United States TA - Diabetes Ther JT - Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders JID - 101539025 PMC - PMC8586382 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Cost-effectiveness OT - Cost-utility OT - GLP-1 receptor agonist OT - Type 2 diabetes mellitus OT - United Kingdom OT - iGlarLixi EDAT- 2021/10/30 06:00 MHDA- 2021/10/30 06:01 PMCR- 2021/10/29 CRDT- 2021/10/29 12:30 PHST- 2021/08/04 00:00 [received] PHST- 2021/09/14 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2021/10/30 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2021/10/30 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2021/10/29 12:30 [entrez] PHST- 2021/10/29 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.1007/s13300-021-01156-1 [pii] AID - 1156 [pii] AID - 10.1007/s13300-021-01156-1 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Diabetes Ther. 2021 Dec;12(12):3231-3241. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01156-1. Epub 2021 Oct 29.