PMID- 34808350 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20220425 LR - 20220425 IS - 1532-6500 (Electronic) IS - 1058-2746 (Linking) VI - 31 IP - 5 DP - 2022 May TI - Characterization of ASES score pain and functional improvement after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a patient-centered perspective. PG - 1042-1046 LID - S1058-2746(21)00810-7 [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.031 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Interpretation of anchor-based clinical differences in the context of pain and functional change remains undefined. The purpose of this study was to characterize American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) scores for patients after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with minimum 1 year of follow-up in terms of pain and change in each functional element on the ASES. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of a prospective institutional patient database of primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties from 2017-2020 with baseline and 1-year postoperative ASES scores. Three clinical outcome groups were established using an anchor-based global rating of change assessment: minimal clinically important difference (MCID), moderate clinical benefit (MCB), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB). Pain and functional outcomes in each group where then characterized and compared. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients were analyzed in terms of demographics and clinical outcomes. Two-thirds (65%) of patients achieved the SCB, 24% achieved the MCB, and 10% achieved the MCID. Washing, reaching for a shelf, and throwing were the most common functional deficits experienced preoperatively and accounted for the largest improvement in function postoperatively. Patients in the MCID group had higher preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (7.1 +/- 3.0) than the MCB (5.8 +/- 2.5) or SCB (5.8 +/- 2.2) groups (P = .0612). The MCID group had the least amount of preoperative functional deficits when compared to the MCB and SCB groups (P = .041). Postoperative VAS pain scores improved by 5.1 in the SCB, 3.6 in the MCB, and 3.7 in the MCID groups. Functional change in each element of the ASES improved by 1.4/4 in the SCB, followed by 0.9/4 in the MCB group and 0.05/4 in the MCID group (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The MCID group had higher preoperative pain scores and the least amount of preoperative functional deficits when compared to the MCB and SCB groups. The MCID was realized through pain improvement only, whereas the MCB and SCB consisted of meaningful improvements in pain and function. CI - Published by Elsevier Inc. FAU - Ahmed, Rifat AU - Ahmed R AD - Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Shoulder Elbow and Sports Medicine (SESM), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. FAU - Lanham, Nathan S AU - Lanham NS AD - Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Shoulder Elbow and Sports Medicine (SESM), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: nathanscottlanham@gmail.com. FAU - Peterson, Joel R AU - Peterson JR AD - Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Shoulder Elbow and Sports Medicine (SESM), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. FAU - Jobin, Charles M AU - Jobin CM AD - Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Shoulder Elbow and Sports Medicine (SESM), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. FAU - Levine, William N AU - Levine WN AD - Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Shoulder Elbow and Sports Medicine (SESM), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20211119 PL - United States TA - J Shoulder Elbow Surg JT - Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery JID - 9206499 SB - IM MH - *Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder MH - Humans MH - Pain MH - Patient-Centered Care MH - Prospective Studies MH - Retrospective Studies MH - *Shoulder Joint/surgery MH - Treatment Outcome OTO - NOTNLM OT - MCB OT - MCID OT - SCB OT - anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty OT - shared decision making EDAT- 2021/11/23 06:00 MHDA- 2022/04/26 06:00 CRDT- 2021/11/22 20:17 PHST- 2021/07/25 00:00 [received] PHST- 2021/10/18 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2021/10/23 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2021/11/23 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2022/04/26 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2021/11/22 20:17 [entrez] AID - S1058-2746(21)00810-7 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.031 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 May;31(5):1042-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.031. Epub 2021 Nov 19.