PMID- 34894408 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20220211 LR - 20220211 IS - 2473-4209 (Electronic) IS - 0094-2405 (Linking) VI - 49 IP - 2 DP - 2022 Feb TI - Technical note: Advancing size-specific dose estimates in CT examinations: Dose estimates at longitudinal positions of scans. PG - 1303-1311 LID - 10.1002/mp.15402 [doi] AB - PURPOSE: American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) (Report 204) introduced the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) for the average dose to the center of a fixed-mA scan. International standards establish a method that CT manufacturers and radiation dose index monitoring software may use to calculate SSDE(z) at longitudinal positions of scans with fixed mA or tube current modulation, and its scan range average SSDE(z) . We sought to test how accurate SSDE(z) is in tracking the average dose to the transverse slab of an axial image slice (D(slice) ), evaluated with Monte Carlo calculation, in the chest and abdominopelvic examinations. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 65 consecutive adult patients undergoing whole-body CT for transcatheter aortic valve implantation planning. Examination parameters (kV, mA, CTDI(vol) ) were extracted from the DICOM headers. Patient water equivalent diameter D(W) (z) was calculated at each image slice, excluding the patient table. A previously validated Monte Carlo simulation (Geant4) program was used to evaluate D(slice) from the chest and abdominopelvic examinations. Alternatively, SSDE(z) was calculated at each slice. The results of the two methods were compared with descriptive statistical outcomes (R, version 4.0.2). RESULTS: In chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations, D(slice) largely changed with anatomic location and uniformly fell off toward scan range edges. Scan range averages SSDE(z) and Dslice were consistent within 2.5%-3.1% (median) and 6.3%-10.4% (maximum) in two examinations. On individual image slices, SSDE(z) could be lower or higher than D(slice) , with deviation ranging from -18.3% to 85% in two edges (2 x 5 cm) of scan range and from -35.2% to 18.7% in the remaining central region of the scan. CONCLUSION: This study provides critical inputs for quality assurance programs. SSDE(z) is useful to track the average dose of all image slices, but further development may be useful for tracking patient dose at the level of individual image slices, especially near a scan range edge. CI - (c) 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. FAU - Li, Xinhua AU - Li X AD - Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. FAU - Marschall, Theodore A AU - Marschall TA AD - Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. FAU - Yang, Kai AU - Yang K AD - Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. FAU - Liu, Bob AU - Liu B AD - Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20211222 PL - United States TA - Med Phys JT - Medical physics JID - 0425746 SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Humans MH - Monte Carlo Method MH - Radiation Dosage MH - Retrospective Studies MH - *Software MH - *Tomography, X-Ray Computed OTO - NOTNLM OT - average dose to image slice OT - comparison OT - computed tomography OT - longitudinal position OT - size-specific dose estimate EDAT- 2021/12/12 06:00 MHDA- 2022/02/12 06:00 CRDT- 2021/12/11 17:03 PHST- 2021/10/29 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2021/07/26 00:00 [received] PHST- 2021/11/22 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2021/12/12 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2022/02/12 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2021/12/11 17:03 [entrez] AID - 10.1002/mp.15402 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Med Phys. 2022 Feb;49(2):1303-1311. doi: 10.1002/mp.15402. Epub 2021 Dec 22.