PMID- 35106384 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20220430 IS - 2405-6316 (Electronic) IS - 2405-6316 (Linking) VI - 21 DP - 2022 Jan TI - Reduction of systematic dosimetric uncertainties in volumetric modulated arc therapy triggered by patient-specific quality assurance. PG - 6-10 LID - 10.1016/j.phro.2022.01.001 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dosimetric patient-Specific Quality Assurance (PSQA) data contain in addition to cases with alerts, many cases without alerts. The aim of this study was to present a procedure to investigate long-term trend analysis of the complete set of PSQA data for the presence of site-specific deviations to reduce underlying systematic dose uncertainties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The procedure started by analysing a large set of prostate Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) PSQA data obtained by comparing 3D electronic portal image device (EPID)_based in vivo dosimetry measurements with dose values predicted by the Treatment Planning System (TPS). If systematic deviations were present, several actions were required. These included confirmation of these deviations with an independent dose verification system for which a 2D detector array in a phantom was used, and analysing calculated with measured PSQA data, or delivery machine characteristics. Further analysis revealed that the under-dosage correlated with plan complexity and coincided with changes in clinically applied planning techniques. RESULTS: Prostate VMAT PSQA data showed an under-dosage gradual increasing to about 2% in 3 years, which was confirmed by the measurements with the 2D detector array in a phantom. The implementation of new beam fits in the TPS led to a reduction of the observed deviations. CONCLUSION: Long-term analysis of site-specific PSQA data is a useful method to monitor incremental changes in a radiotherapy department due to various changes in the treatment planning and delivery of prostate VMAT, and may lead to a reduction of systematic dose uncertainties in complex treatments. CI - (c) 2022 The Authors. FAU - Mans, Anton AU - Mans A AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. FAU - Rozendaal, Roel AU - Rozendaal R AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. FAU - Janssen, Tomas AU - Janssen T AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. FAU - Damen, Eugene AU - Damen E AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. FAU - Kaas, Jochem AU - Kaas J AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. FAU - van Mourik, Anke AU - van Mourik A AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. FAU - Mijnheer, Ben AU - Mijnheer B AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20220120 PL - Netherlands TA - Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol JT - Physics and imaging in radiation oncology JID - 101704276 PMC - PMC8789528 OTO - NOTNLM OT - 3D EPID dosimetry OT - Detector array OT - Patient-specific QA OT - Plan complexity OT - Time-trends OT - VMAT COIS- The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. EDAT- 2022/02/03 06:00 MHDA- 2022/02/03 06:01 PMCR- 2022/01/20 CRDT- 2022/02/02 05:35 PHST- 2021/02/22 00:00 [received] PHST- 2021/12/24 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2022/01/07 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2022/02/02 05:35 [entrez] PHST- 2022/02/03 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2022/02/03 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2022/01/20 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - S2405-6316(22)00001-X [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.phro.2022.01.001 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jan 20;21:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.01.001. eCollection 2022 Jan.