PMID- 35171837 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20240517 IS - 1547-5646 (Electronic) IS - 1547-5654 (Print) IS - 1547-5646 (Linking) VI - 37 IP - 1 DP - 2022 Jul 1 TI - Patient-reported outcome measure clustering after surgery for adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis. PG - 80-91 LID - 10.3171/2021.11.SPINE21949 [doi] LID - 2021.11.SPINE21949 AB - OBJECTIVE: Adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis (ASLS) is a widespread and debilitating subset of adult spinal deformity. Although many patients benefit from operative treatment, surgery entails substantial cost and risk for adverse events. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are patient-centered tools used to evaluate the appropriateness of surgery and to assist in the shared decision-making process. Framing realistic patient expectations should include the possible functional limitation to improvement inherent in surgical intervention, such as multilevel fusion to the sacrum. The authors' objective was to predict postoperative ASLS PROMs by using clustering analysis, generalized longitudinal regression models, percentile analysis, and clinical improvement analysis of preoperative health-related quality-of-life scores for use in surgical counseling. METHODS: Operative results from the combined ASLS cohorts were examined. PROM score clustering after surgery investigated limits of surgical improvement. Patients were categorized by baseline disability (mild, moderate, moderate to severe, or severe) according to preoperative Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Responder analysis for patients achieving improvement meeting the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) standards was performed using both fixed-threshold and patient-specific values (MCID = 30% of remaining scale, SCB = 50%). Best (top 5%), worst (bottom 5%), and median scores were calculated across disability categories. RESULTS: A total of 171/187 (91%) of patients with ASLS achieved 2-year follow-up. Patients rarely achieved a PROM ceiling for any measure, with 33%-43% of individuals clustering near 4.0 for SRS domains. Patients with severe baseline disability (< 2.0) SRS-pain and SRS-function scores were often left with moderate to severe disability (2.0-2.9), unlike patients with higher (>/= 3.0) initial PROM values. Patients with mild disability according to baseline SRS-function score were unlikely to improve. Crippling baseline ODI disability (> 60) commonly left patients with moderate disability (median ODI = 32). As baseline ODI disability increased, patients were more likely to achieve MCID and SCB (p < 0.001). Compared to fixed threshold values for MCID and SCB, patient-specific values were more sensitive to change for patients with minimal ODI baseline disability (p = 0.008) and less sensitive to change for patients with moderate to severe SRS subscore disability (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ASLS surgeries have a limit to possible improvement, probably due to both baseline disability and the effects of surgery. The most disabled patients often had moderate to severe disability (SRS < 3, ODI > 30) at 2 years, emphasizing the importance of patient counseling and expectation management. FAU - Wondra, James P AU - Wondra JP AD - 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. FAU - Kelly, Michael P AU - Kelly MP AD - 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. FAU - Yanik, Elizabeth L AU - Yanik EL AD - 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. FAU - Greenberg, Jacob K AU - Greenberg JK AD - 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. FAU - Smith, Justin S AU - Smith JS AD - 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia. FAU - Bess, Shay AU - Bess S AD - 3Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado. FAU - Shaffrey, Christopher I AU - Shaffrey CI AD - 4Department of Neurological Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and. FAU - Lenke, Lawrence G AU - Lenke LG AD - 5Och Spine Hospital, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York. FAU - Bridwell, Keith AU - Bridwell K AD - 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20220114 PL - United States TA - J Neurosurg Spine JT - Journal of neurosurgery. Spine JID - 101223545 SB - IM PMC - PMC10193483 OTO - NOTNLM OT - adult OT - lumbar OT - patient-reported outcomes OT - scoliosis OT - spine deformity OT - surgery COIS- Dr. Smith is a consultant for Zimmer Biomet, NuVasive, Carlsmed, Cerapedics, DePuy Synthes, SeaSpine, and Stryker. He reports direct stock ownership in NuVasive and Alphatec. He received clinical or research support for the study described (includes equipment or material) from DePuy Synthes/ISSGF, and he received support of a non-study-related clinical or research effort that he oversaw from DePuy Synthes/ISSGF, NuVasive, and AO Spine. He receives royalties from Zimmer Biomet, NuVasive, and Thieme. Dr. Bess is a consultant for Stryker, Mirus, and Atec. He is a patent holder with Stryker and NuVasive. He received clinical or research support for the study described (includes equipment or material) from ISSFG, Medtronic, Globus, Stryker, Zimmer, and NuVasive. He received support of a non-study-related clinical or research effort that he oversaw from ISSGF, NuVasive, Medtronic, Stryker, Globus, SI Bone, and SeaSpine. He receives royalties from Stryker and NuVasive. Dr. Shaffrey is a consultant for Medtronic, NuVasive, and SI Bone. He reports direct stock ownership in NuVasive. He is a patent holder with Medtronic, NuVasive, Zimmer Biomet, and SI Bone. He receives royalties from Medtronic, NuVasive, and SI Bone. Dr. Lenke reports the following. 1) Medtronic: paid consultant (monies donated to a charitable foundation), royalties. 2) Broadwater: reimbursement for airfare/hotel. 3) Scoliosis Research Society: reimbursement for airfare/hotel, grant support (monies to institution). 4) Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation: grant support (monies to institution). 5) Evans Family donation: philanthropic research funding from grateful patient/family. 6) Fox Family Foundation: philanthropic research funding from grateful patient. 7) AO Spine: reimbursement for airfare/hotel, grant support (monies to institution), and fellowship support to institution. 8) Acuity Surgical: paid consultant (monies donated to charitable foundation), royalties. 9) Abryx: paid consultant (monies donated to charitable foundation). EDAT- 2022/02/17 06:00 MHDA- 2022/02/17 06:01 PMCR- 2022/01/14 CRDT- 2022/02/16 17:12 PHST- 2021/08/13 00:00 [received] PHST- 2021/11/09 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2022/02/17 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2022/02/17 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2022/02/16 17:12 [entrez] PHST- 2022/01/14 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 2021.11.SPINE21949 [pii] AID - 10.3171/2021.11.SPINE21949 [doi] PST - epublish SO - J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 Jan 14;37(1):80-91. doi: 10.3171/2021.11.SPINE21949. Print 2022 Jul 1.