PMID- 35351729 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20220421 LR - 20220524 IS - 2044-6055 (Electronic) IS - 2044-6055 (Linking) VI - 12 IP - 3 DP - 2022 Mar 29 TI - Minimum clinically important difference of the Social Functioning in Dementia Scale (SF-DEM): cross-sectional study and Delphi survey. PG - e058252 LID - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058252 [doi] LID - e058252 AB - OBJECTIVES: Good social functioning is important for people living with dementia and their families. The Social Functioning in Dementia Scale (SF-DEM) is a valid and reliable instrument measuring social functioning in dementia. However the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) has not yet been derived for SF-DEM. This study aims to define the MCID for the SF-DEM. DESIGN: We used triangulation, incorporating data from a cross-sectional study to calculate the MCID using distribution-based and anchor-based methods, and a Delphi survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The cross-sectional survey comprised 299 family carers of people with dementia. Twenty dementia experts (researchers, clinicians, family carers) rated whether changes on clinical vignettes represented a meaningful change in the Delphi survey. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We calculated the distribution-based MCID as 0.5 of an SD for each of the three SF-DEM domains (1-spending time with others, 2-communicating with others, 3-sensitivity to others). We used the carers' rating of social functioning to calculate the anchor-based MCID. For the Delphi survey, we defined consensus as >/=75% agreement. Where there was lack of consensus, experts were asked to complete a further survey round. RESULTS: We found that 0.5 SD of SF-DEM was 1.9 points, 2.2 and 1.4 points in domains 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Using the anchoring analysis, the MCIDs were 1.7 points, 1.7 points, and 0.9 points in domains 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The Delphi method required two rounds. In the second round, a consensus was reached that a 2-point change was considered significant in all three domains, but no consensus was reached on a 1-point change. CONCLUSIONS: By triangulating all three methods, the SF-DEM's MCIDs were 1.9, 2.0 and 1.4 points for domains 1, 2 and 3, respectively. For individuals, these values should be rounded to a 2-point change for each domain. CI - (c) Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. FAU - Levene, Tamara AU - Levene T AD - Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK. FAU - Livingston, Gill AU - Livingston G AD - Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK. AD - Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. FAU - Banerjee, Sube AU - Banerjee S AD - Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK. FAU - Sommerlad, Andrew AU - Sommerlad A AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-8895-7055 AD - Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK a.sommerlad@ucl.ac.uk. AD - Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't DEP - 20220329 PL - England TA - BMJ Open JT - BMJ open JID - 101552874 SB - IM MH - Cross-Sectional Studies MH - *Dementia/diagnosis MH - Humans MH - Minimal Clinically Important Difference MH - *Social Interaction MH - Surveys and Questionnaires PMC - PMC8966522 OTO - NOTNLM OT - delirium & cognitive disorders OT - dementia OT - epidemiology OT - old age psychiatry COIS- Competing interests: None declared. EDAT- 2022/03/31 06:00 MHDA- 2022/04/22 06:00 PMCR- 2022/03/29 CRDT- 2022/03/30 05:40 PHST- 2022/03/30 05:40 [entrez] PHST- 2022/03/31 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2022/04/22 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2022/03/29 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - bmjopen-2021-058252 [pii] AID - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058252 [doi] PST - epublish SO - BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 29;12(3):e058252. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058252.