PMID- 35393978 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20220425 LR - 20230903 IS - 1537-453X (Electronic) IS - 0277-3732 (Linking) VI - 45 IP - 5 DP - 2022 May 1 TI - Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Spinal Metastases: Real-world Outcomes From an International Multi-institutional SBRT Registry. PG - 196-201 LID - 10.1097/COC.0000000000000909 [doi] AB - OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes following single fraction versus fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional registry was queried for patients with spinal metastases treated with single-fraction or fractionated SBRT. Potential predictive factors of local control (LC) and overall survival were evaluated. Pretreatment and posttreatment Visual Analog Scale scores were analyzed to examine initial and durable pain responses and complete response (CR) rates. Logistic regression was utilized to assess potential correlations between pain response, biologically effective dose (BED), and fractionation. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-six patients with 514 lesions treated with SBRT were identified; 209 and 104 lesions had information on LC and pain, respectively. The median pain score of patients with symptoms was 6 (range: 3 to 10). The median follow-up was 8.9 months (range: 0.4 to 125.5 mo). Utilizing Karnofsky Performance Score, age, and primary site (lung and/or nonbreast), 1-year overall survival rates were 76.1%, 59.1%, 54.9%, 37.2%, and 23.5% for patients with 0 to 4 of these factors, respectively (P<0.0001). One- and 2-year LC rates were 79.9% and 73.6%, respectively. Eighty-six patients (82.7%) had an initial pain response with a median decline of 3.5 and a CR rate of 47.1%. Sixty-five patients (62.5%) had a durable pain response with a median decline of 2 and a CR rate of 20.2%. Higher initial CR rates were observed with BED10 >/=51 Gy10 (58.7% vs. 37.9%; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Following SBRT, encouraging palliative responses with >80% and 60% of patients having initial and durable pain responses, respectively. Dose escalation may result in improved initial CR rates. Performance status, age, and primary histology are factors to consider in the absence of pain. CI - Copyright (c) 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - Singh, Raj AU - Singh R AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA. FAU - Valluri, Anisha AU - Valluri A AD - Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine. FAU - Jenkins, Jan AU - Jenkins J AD - The Radiosurgery Society, Sunnyvale, CA. FAU - Davis, Joanne AU - Davis J AD - The Radiosurgery Society, Sunnyvale, CA. FAU - Vargo, John A AU - Vargo JA AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA. FAU - Sharma, Sanjeev AU - Sharma S AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Mary's Medical Center, Huntington, WV. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Multicenter Study DEP - 20220408 PL - United States TA - Am J Clin Oncol JT - American journal of clinical oncology JID - 8207754 SB - IM MH - Follow-Up Studies MH - Humans MH - Pain MH - *Radiosurgery MH - Registries MH - *Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy/secondary COIS- The authors declare no conflicts of interest. EDAT- 2022/04/09 06:00 MHDA- 2022/04/26 06:00 CRDT- 2022/04/08 08:47 PHST- 2022/04/09 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2022/04/26 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2022/04/08 08:47 [entrez] AID - 00000421-202205000-00003 [pii] AID - 10.1097/COC.0000000000000909 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Am J Clin Oncol. 2022 May 1;45(5):196-201. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000909. Epub 2022 Apr 8.