PMID- 35544357 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20230130 LR - 20230819 IS - 1533-4287 (Electronic) IS - 1064-8011 (Linking) VI - 37 IP - 2 DP - 2023 Feb 1 TI - Comparing the Effects of Long-Term vs. Periodic Inclusion of Isometric Strength Training on Strength and Dynamic Performances. PG - 305-314 LID - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004276 [doi] AB - Lum, D, Joseph, R, Ong, KY, Tang, JM, and Suchomel, TJ. Comparing the effects of long-term vs. periodic inclusion of isometric strength training on strength and dynamic performances. J Strength Cond Res 37(2): 305-314, 2023-This study compared the effects of including isometric strength training (IST) for consecutive 24 weeks (CIST) against a periodic inclusion (PIST) of this mode of training on strength and dynamic performances. Twenty-four floorball athletes (age: 23 +/- 2.7 years, stature: 1.74 +/- 2.08 m, and body mass: 72.7 +/- 14.4 kg) were randomly assigned to the control (CON), CIST, or PIST group. Athletes completed 20-m sprint, countermovement jump (CMJ), and isometric midthigh pull (IMTP) during pre-test and were tested on weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24. All groups performed a similar strength training program twice per week. However, 2 sets of squats were replaced with isometric squat in CIST for all 24 weeks but only on weeks 1-6 and 13-18 for PIST. A significant main effect for time was observed for 5-, 10-, and 20-m sprint time, CMJ height, peak force, peak power, time to take-off, modified reactive strength index, IMTP peak force, relative peak force, and force at 200 milliseconds ( p = <0.001-0.037). Isometric strength training for 24 consecutive weeks resulted in greater improvement in 5-m sprint time than CON at week 24 ( p = 0.024, g = 1.17). Both CIST and PIST resulted in greater improvements in 10-m sprint time than CON at various time points ( p = 0.007-0.038 and 0.038, g = 1.07-1.44 and 1.18, respectively). Isometric strength training for 24 consecutive weeks and PIST resulted in greater improvements in 20-m sprint time than CON at week 6 ( p = 0.007 and 0.025, g = 1.65 and 1.40, respectively). The results showed that the inclusion of IST resulted in greater improvements in sprint performance than CON but no significant difference in all measured variables with PIST. CI - Copyright (c) 2022 National Strength and Conditioning Association. FAU - Lum, Danny AU - Lum D AD - Sport Science and Sport Medicine, Singapore Sport Institute, Singapore, Singapore; and. FAU - Joseph, Ranald AU - Joseph R AD - Sport Science and Sport Medicine, Singapore Sport Institute, Singapore, Singapore; and. FAU - Ong, Keng Y AU - Ong KY AD - Sport Science and Sport Medicine, Singapore Sport Institute, Singapore, Singapore; and. FAU - Tang, Jei M AU - Tang JM AD - Sport Science and Sport Medicine, Singapore Sport Institute, Singapore, Singapore; and. FAU - Suchomel, Timothy J AU - Suchomel TJ AD - Department of Human Movement Sciences, Carroll University, Waukesha, Wisconsin. LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Randomized Controlled Trial DEP - 20220509 PL - United States TA - J Strength Cond Res JT - Journal of strength and conditioning research JID - 9415084 SB - IM MH - Adult MH - Humans MH - Young Adult MH - Athletes/statistics & numerical data MH - *Athletic Performance/physiology MH - *Resistance Training/methods MH - *Running/physiology EDAT- 2022/05/12 06:00 MHDA- 2023/01/28 06:00 CRDT- 2022/05/11 12:33 PHST- 2022/05/12 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2023/01/28 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2022/05/11 12:33 [entrez] AID - 00124278-202302000-00007 [pii] AID - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004276 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Feb 1;37(2):305-314. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004276. Epub 2022 May 9.