PMID- 35622713
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20220531
LR  - 20220617
IS  - 1600-0668 (Electronic)
IS  - 0905-6947 (Linking)
VI  - 32
IP  - 5
DP  - 2022 May
TI  - Objective sleep assessments for healthy people in environmental research: A 
      literature review.
PG  - e13034
LID - 10.1111/ina.13034 [doi]
AB  - To date, although many studies had focused on the impact of environmental factors 
      on sleep, how to choose the proper assessment method for objective sleep quality 
      was often ignored, especially for healthy subjects in bedroom environment. In 
      order to provide methodological guidance for future research, this paper reviewed 
      the assessments of objective sleep quality applied in environmental researches, 
      compared them from the perspective of accuracy and interference, and 
      statistically analyzed the impact of experimental type and subjects' information 
      on method selection. The review results showed that, in contrast to 
      polysomnography (PSG), the accuracy of actigraphy (ACT), respiratory 
      monitoring-oxygen saturation monitoring (RM-OSM), and electrocardiograph (ECG) 
      could reach up to 97%, 80.38%, and 79.95%, respectively. In terms of sleep 
      staging, PSG and ECG performed the best, ACT the second, and RM-OSM the worst; as 
      compared to single methods, mix methods were more accurate and better at sleep 
      staging. PSG interfered with sleep a great deal, while ECG and ACT could be 
      non-contact, and thus, the least interference with sleep was present. The type of 
      experiment significantly influenced the choice of assessment method (p < 0.001), 
      85.3% of researchers chose PSG in laboratory study while 82.5% ACT in field 
      study; moreover, PSG was often used in a relatively small number of young 
      subjects, while ACT had a wide applicable population. In general, researchers 
      need to pay more attention at selection of assessments in future studies, and 
      this review can be used as a reliable reference for experimental design.
CI  - (c) 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
FAU - Xu, Xinbo
AU  - Xu X
AD  - School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
FAU - Lian, Zhiwei
AU  - Lian Z
AD  - School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
PT  - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PT  - Review
PL  - England
TA  - Indoor Air
JT  - Indoor air
JID - 9423515
SB  - IM
MH  - *Actigraphy
MH  - *Air Pollution, Indoor
MH  - Humans
MH  - Polysomnography/methods
MH  - Sleep
MH  - Sleep Stages
OTO - NOTNLM
OT  - accuracy
OT  - assessment methods
OT  - bedroom environment
OT  - interference
OT  - objective sleep quality
EDAT- 2022/05/28 06:00
MHDA- 2022/06/01 06:00
CRDT- 2022/05/27 13:12
PHST- 2022/04/04 00:00 [revised]
PHST- 2022/03/03 00:00 [received]
PHST- 2022/04/18 00:00 [accepted]
PHST- 2022/05/27 13:12 [entrez]
PHST- 2022/05/28 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2022/06/01 06:00 [medline]
AID - 10.1111/ina.13034 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Indoor Air. 2022 May;32(5):e13034. doi: 10.1111/ina.13034.