PMID- 35639258 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20230224 LR - 20230224 IS - 2240-2993 (Electronic) IS - 0300-9009 (Linking) VI - 123 IP - 1 DP - 2023 Feb TI - Prioritization of neurologic rehabilitation interventions by ELECTRE-III analysis in subacute stroke patients. PG - 181-189 LID - 10.1007/s13760-022-01982-5 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Elimination and Choice Translating Reality (ELECTRE) III is a commonly used multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) method when alternatives are being prioritized in health sciences. The selection of the rehabilitation approach is the key factor to improve the upper extremity functions of stroke patients. Thus, choosing a reasonably good treatment approach will directly reduce the patient's cost to the government and caregivers, while also improving quality of life. The aim of our study was to prioritize the six different methods used in the rehabilitation of stroke patients with mild or moderate upper extremity dysfunction, using one of the MCDM methods based on experts' opinions. METHODS: A three-stage face-to-face interview across Turkey, based on the ELECTRE-III method, was conducted with 18 physiotherapists specializing in the rehabilitation of mild or moderate stroke-induced upper extremity disorders. RESULTS: According to ELECTRE-III, Circuit Class Therapy (CCT) is the best choice for treating upper extremity functional loss in general. It is also the best alternative in both the ascending and descending distillation processes of ELECTRE-III. On the other hand, Bobath neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) has a similar success level according to ascending distillation. Mirror therapy and constraint-induced movement therapy are the third-best methods in the analysis. However, robotic rehabilitation is the least preferable treatment method according to the experts' judgments. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that rehabilitation interventions such as Bobath-NDT and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, which are frequently used in developing countries, are still useful, and CCT is the most appropriate intervention for the transition from conventional methods to innovative models in these countries. CI - (c) 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Belgian Neurological Society. FAU - Turkmen, Ceyhun AU - Turkmen C AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-3125-4113 AD - Faculty of Health Sciences, Cankiri Karatekin University, 18200 Sihhiye st, Cankiri, Turkey. fztceyhunturkmen@gmail.com. FAU - Konca, Murat AU - Konca M AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-6830-8090 AD - Faculty of Health Sciences, Cankiri Karatekin University, 18200 Sihhiye st, Cankiri, Turkey. FAU - Yetim, Birol AU - Yetim B AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-1294-1874 AD - Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, 06800, Ankara, Turkey. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20220531 PL - Italy TA - Acta Neurol Belg JT - Acta neurologica Belgica JID - 0247035 SB - IM MH - Humans MH - *Stroke Rehabilitation/methods MH - Quality of Life MH - *Stroke/therapy MH - *Neurological Rehabilitation MH - Upper Extremity MH - Recovery of Function OTO - NOTNLM OT - Decision-making OT - Innovative therapies OT - Neurological rehabilitation OT - Stroke OT - Upper extremity EDAT- 2022/06/01 06:00 MHDA- 2023/02/25 06:00 CRDT- 2022/05/31 15:44 PHST- 2022/04/04 00:00 [received] PHST- 2022/05/12 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2022/06/01 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2023/02/25 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2022/05/31 15:44 [entrez] AID - 10.1007/s13760-022-01982-5 [pii] AID - 10.1007/s13760-022-01982-5 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Acta Neurol Belg. 2023 Feb;123(1):181-189. doi: 10.1007/s13760-022-01982-5. Epub 2022 May 31.