PMID- 35664564 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20220716 IS - 1687-8450 (Print) IS - 1687-8469 (Electronic) IS - 1687-8450 (Linking) VI - 2022 DP - 2022 TI - The Tumor Plastic Surgery Technology versus Traditional Repair Technology on the Repair of Large-Area Skin Defects after Maxillofacial Tumor Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PG - 3004695 LID - 10.1155/2022/3004695 [doi] LID - 3004695 AB - OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of tumor plastic surgery on the repair of large-area skin defects after maxillofacial tumor resection. METHODS: 90 patients undergoing maxillofacial tumor resection in our hospital from March 2019 to March 2020 were selected and randomized 1 : 1 to receive either tumor plastic surgery (experimental group) or traditional repair (control group). The clinical efficacy and facial cosmetic improvement of the two groups were compared. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used to evaluate the surgical outcomes of the two groups, the Profile of Mood States (POMS) was used to evaluate the patients' psychological status, and the Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74) was used to assess the quality of life of patients. RESULTS: Total clinical effective rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (p < 0.001). A higher excellent rate of facial cosmetic improvement was observed in the experimental group versus the control group (p < 0.001). Significantly lower POSAS scores of the experimental group than the control group were observed (p < 0.001). The POMS scores of the experimental group after treatment were lower than those of the control group (p < 0.001). Tumor plastic surgery resulted in a remarkably higher GQOLI-74 score in the patients versus traditional repair (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Tumor plastic surgery is a promising alternative for patients undergoing maxillofacial tumor resection. It can effectively promote the recovery of facial morphology and physiological function of patients, with high clinical efficacy, so it merits promotion and application. CI - Copyright (c) 2022 Xue-Feng Zhang et al. FAU - Zhang, Xue-Feng AU - Zhang XF AD - Department of Orthopedics, Panzhihua Iron and Steel Group General Hospital, Panzhihua, Sichuan Province, China. FAU - Chu, Zheng AU - Chu Z AUID- ORCID: 0000-0003-3275-239X AD - Department of Neurosurgery, Panzhihua Iron and Steel Group General Hospital, Panzhihua, Sichuan Province, China. FAU - Yang, Hong-Li AU - Yang HL AD - Department of Science and Education, General Hospital of Pangang Group, Panzhihua, Sichuan Province, China. FAU - Zhao, Bing AU - Zhao B AD - Plastic Surgery Department of Chengdu Fuli Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20220526 PL - Egypt TA - J Oncol JT - Journal of oncology JID - 101496537 PMC - PMC9162858 COIS- The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. EDAT- 2022/06/07 06:00 MHDA- 2022/06/07 06:01 PMCR- 2022/05/26 CRDT- 2022/06/06 14:16 PHST- 2021/12/31 00:00 [received] PHST- 2022/04/12 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2022/04/19 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2022/06/06 14:16 [entrez] PHST- 2022/06/07 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2022/06/07 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2022/05/26 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.1155/2022/3004695 [doi] PST - epublish SO - J Oncol. 2022 May 26;2022:3004695. doi: 10.1155/2022/3004695. eCollection 2022.