PMID- 35874050 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20220726 IS - 2405-8440 (Print) IS - 2405-8440 (Electronic) IS - 2405-8440 (Linking) VI - 8 IP - 7 DP - 2022 Jul TI - Performance of the BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 panel for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections. PG - e09983 LID - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09983 [doi] LID - e09983 AB - BACKGROUND: Conventional blood cultures methods are associated with long turnaround times, preventing early treatment optimization in bloodstream infections. The BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) Panel is a new multiplex PCR applied on positive blood cultures, reducing time to pathogen identification and resistant markers detection. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study including positive blood cultures from Intensive Care Units and Emergency Departments and performed BCID2 in addition to conventional testing. Concordance between the two methods was assessed and BCID2 performance characteristics were evaluated. Resistance markers detected by BCID2 were confirmed by in-house PCR. Whole genome sequencing was performed in discordant cases. RESULTS: Among 60 monomicrobial blood cultures, BCID2 correctly identified 55/56 (91.7%) on-panel pathogens, showing an overall concordance of 98%. In 4/60 cases BCID2 did not detect any target and these all grew BCID2 off-panel bacteria. Only one discordant case was found. Sensitivity and specificity for Gram-positive bacteria on monomicrobial samples were 100% (95% CI 85.8-100%) and 100% (95% CI 90.3-100%) respectively, while for Gram-negatives 100% (95% CI 87.7-100) and 96.9% (95% CI 83.8-99.9%), respectively. Among two polymicrobial blood cultures, full concordance was observed in one case only. BCID2 identified antimicrobial resistance genes in 6/62 samples, all confirmed by in-house PCR (3 mecA/C S. epidermidis, 3 bla (CTX-M) E. coli). Estimated time to results gained using BCID2 as compared to conventional testing was 9.69 h (95% CI: 7.85-11.53). CONCLUSIONS: BCID2 showed good agreement with conventional methods. Studies to assess its clinical impact are warranted. CI - (c) 2022 The Author(s). FAU - Peri, Anna Maria AU - Peri AM AD - University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Brisbane City, QLD, 4029, Australia. FAU - Bauer, Michelle J AU - Bauer MJ AD - University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Brisbane City, QLD, 4029, Australia. FAU - Bergh, Haakon AU - Bergh H AD - Central Microbiology, Pathology Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane City, QLD, 4029, Australia. FAU - Butkiewicz, Dominika AU - Butkiewicz D AD - University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Brisbane City, QLD, 4029, Australia. FAU - Paterson, David L AU - Paterson DL AD - University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Brisbane City, QLD, 4029, Australia. AD - Infectious Diseases Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane City, QLD, 4029, Australia. FAU - Harris, Patrick Na AU - Harris PN AD - University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Brisbane City, QLD, 4029, Australia. AD - Central Microbiology, Pathology Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane City, QLD, 4029, Australia. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20220719 PL - England TA - Heliyon JT - Heliyon JID - 101672560 PMC - PMC9304729 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Blood culture OT - Bloodstream infection OT - Molecular diagnostic techniques OT - Sepsis COIS- The authors declare no conflict of interest. EDAT- 2022/07/26 06:00 MHDA- 2022/07/26 06:01 PMCR- 2022/07/19 CRDT- 2022/07/25 03:46 PHST- 2021/12/25 00:00 [received] PHST- 2022/03/01 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2022/07/13 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2022/07/25 03:46 [entrez] PHST- 2022/07/26 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2022/07/26 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2022/07/19 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - S2405-8440(22)01271-3 [pii] AID - e09983 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09983 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Heliyon. 2022 Jul 19;8(7):e09983. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09983. eCollection 2022 Jul.