PMID- 35922714 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20220907 LR - 20220907 IS - 1179-6901 (Electronic) IS - 1174-5886 (Print) IS - 1174-5886 (Linking) VI - 22 IP - 3 DP - 2022 Sep TI - Antiplatelets Versus Anticoagulation in Cervical Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 2064 Patients. PG - 187-203 LID - 10.1007/s40268-022-00398-z [doi] AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In young people aged < 50 years, cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is among the most common causes of stroke. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the safest and most effective antithrombotic treatment for CeAD. We aimed to synthesize concrete evidence from studies that compared the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet (AP) versus anticoagulant (AC) therapies for CeAD. METHODS: We searched major electronic databases/search engines from inception till September 2021. Cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anticoagulants with antiplatelets for CeAD were included. A meta-analysis was conducted using articles that were obtained and found to be relevant. Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used for continuous data and odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for dichotomous data. RESULTS: Our analysis included 15 studies involving 2064 patients, 909 (44%) of whom received antiplatelets and 1155 (56%) received anticoagulants. Our analysis showed a non-significant difference in terms of the 3-month mortality (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.03-7.58), > 3-month mortality (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.40-6.56), recurrent stroke (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.46-2.02), recurrent transient ischaemic attack (TIA) (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.44-1.98), symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.12-1.19), and complete recanalization (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.46-1.06). Regarding primary ischaemic stroke, the results favoured AC over AP among RCTs (OR 6.97, 95% CI 1.25-38.83). CONCLUSION: Our study did not show a considerable difference between the two groups, as all outcomes showed non-significant differences between them, except for primary ischaemic stroke (RCTs) and complete recanalization (observational studies), which showed a significant favour of AC over AP. Even though primary ischaemic stroke is an important outcome, several crucial points that could affect these results should be paid attention to. These include the incomplete adjustment for the confounding effect of AP-AC doses, frequencies, administration compliance, and others. We recommend more well-designed studies to assess if unnecessary anticoagulation can be avoided in CeAD. CI - (c) 2022. The Author(s). FAU - Hagrass, Abdulrahman Ibrahim AU - Hagrass AI AD - Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. FAU - Almaghary, Bashar Khaled AU - Almaghary BK AD - Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University-Gaza, Gaza Strip, Palestine. FAU - Mostafa, Mohamed Abdelhady AU - Mostafa MA AD - Paradise Neurology and Rehabilitation Clinics, Alexandria, Egypt. FAU - Elfil, Mohamed AU - Elfil M AD - Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. FAU - Elsayed, Sarah Makram AU - Elsayed SM AD - Faculty of Medicine, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt. FAU - Aboali, Amira A AU - Aboali AA AD - Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, El-Shatby, 22 El-Guish Road, Alexandria, 21526, Egypt. FAU - Hamdallah, Aboalmagd AU - Hamdallah A AD - Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Damietta, Egypt. FAU - Hasan, Mohammed Tarek AU - Hasan MT AD - Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. FAU - Al-Kafarna, Mohammed AU - Al-Kafarna M AD - Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University-Gaza, Gaza Strip, Palestine. FAU - Ragab, Khaled Mohamed AU - Ragab KM AD - Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt. FAU - Doheim, Mohamed Fahmy AU - Doheim MF AUID- ORCID: 0000-0001-8279-5078 AD - Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, El-Shatby, 22 El-Guish Road, Alexandria, 21526, Egypt. fahmydoheim@alumni.harvard.edu. LA - eng PT - Meta-Analysis PT - Systematic Review DEP - 20220803 PL - New Zealand TA - Drugs R D JT - Drugs in R&D JID - 100883647 RN - 0 (Anticoagulants) RN - 0 (Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors) SB - IM MH - Adolescent MH - Anticoagulants/adverse effects MH - Arteries MH - Humans MH - *Ischemic Stroke MH - Observational Studies as Topic MH - Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects MH - *Stroke/drug therapy/etiology/prevention & control PMC - PMC9433613 COIS- Abdulrahman Ibrahim Hagrass, Bashar Khaled Almaghary, Mohamed Abdelhady Mostafa, Mohamed Elfil, Sarah Makram Elsayed, Amira A. Aboali, Aboalmagd Hamdallah, Mohammed Tarek Hasan, Mohammed Al-kafarna, Khaled Mohamed Ragab and Mohamed Fahmy Doheim declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the content of this article. EDAT- 2022/08/04 06:00 MHDA- 2022/09/08 06:00 PMCR- 2022/08/03 CRDT- 2022/08/03 23:33 PHST- 2022/07/19 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2022/08/04 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2022/09/08 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2022/08/03 23:33 [entrez] PHST- 2022/08/03 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.1007/s40268-022-00398-z [pii] AID - 398 [pii] AID - 10.1007/s40268-022-00398-z [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Drugs R D. 2022 Sep;22(3):187-203. doi: 10.1007/s40268-022-00398-z. Epub 2022 Aug 3.