PMID- 35927703 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20220808 LR - 20220808 IS - 1472-6963 (Electronic) IS - 1472-6963 (Linking) VI - 22 IP - 1 DP - 2022 Aug 4 TI - Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis of intermediate surgical risk in Singapore. PG - 994 LID - 10.1186/s12913-022-08369-5 [doi] LID - 994 AB - OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis with intermediate surgical risk in Singapore. METHODS: A de novo Markov model with three health states - stroke with long-term sequelae, no stroke, and death - was developed and simulated using Monte Carlo simulations with 10,000 iterations over a five-year time horizon from the Singapore healthcare system perspective. A 3% annual discount rate for costs and outcomes and monthly cycle lengths were used. By applying the longest available published clinical evidence, simulated patients received either TAVI or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and were at risk of adverse events (AEs) such as moderate-to-severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR). RESULTS: When five-year PARTNER 2A data was applied, base-case analyses showed that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for TAVI compared to SAVR was US$315,760 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The high ICER was due to high incremental implantation and procedure costs of TAVI compared to SAVR, and marginal improvement of 0.10 QALYs as simulated mortality of TAVI exceeded SAVR at 3.75 years post-implantation. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the ICERs were most sensitive to cost of PAR, utility values of SAVR patients, and cost of TAVI and SAVR implants and procedures. When disutilities for AEs were additionally applied, the ICER decreased to US$300,070 per QALY gained. TAVI was dominated by SAVR when the time horizon increased to 20 years. Clinical outcomes projected from one-year PARTNER S3i data further reduced the ICER to US$86,337 per QALY gained for TAVI, assuming early all-cause mortality benefits from TAVI continued to persist. This assumption was undermined when longer term data showed that TAVI's early mortality benefits diminished at five years. LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSION: TAVI is unlikely to be cost-effective in intermediate surgical-risk patients compared to SAVR in Singapore. CI - (c) 2022. The Author(s). FAU - See-Toh, Rachel Su-En AU - See-Toh RS AD - Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore. FAU - Wong, Xin Yi AU - Wong XY AD - Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore. FAU - Mahboobani, Kush Shiv Kishore Herkshin AU - Mahboobani KSKH AD - Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore. FAU - Soon, Swee Sung AU - Soon SS AD - Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore. FAU - Kearns, Benjamin AU - Kearns B AD - School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. FAU - Cooper, Katy AU - Cooper K AD - School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. FAU - Ho, Kay Woon AU - Ho KW AD - National Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore. FAU - Kuntjoro, Ivandito AU - Kuntjoro I AD - National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore. FAU - Ng, Kwong AU - Ng K AD - Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore. ng_kwong_hoe@moh.gov.sg. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20220804 PL - England TA - BMC Health Serv Res JT - BMC health services research JID - 101088677 SB - IM MH - *Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery MH - Cost-Benefit Analysis MH - *Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects/methods MH - Humans MH - Risk Factors MH - Singapore/epidemiology MH - *Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects MH - Treatment Outcome PMC - PMC9354430 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Cost-effectiveness OT - Singapore OT - TAVI OT - TAVR OT - Transcatheter aortic valve implantation OT - Transcatheter aortic valve replacement COIS- H.K. and I.K. received honoraria as speakers from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. All other authors declared no competing interests. EDAT- 2022/08/05 06:00 MHDA- 2022/08/09 06:00 PMCR- 2022/08/04 CRDT- 2022/08/04 23:47 PHST- 2022/01/03 00:00 [received] PHST- 2022/07/18 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2022/08/04 23:47 [entrez] PHST- 2022/08/05 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2022/08/09 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2022/08/04 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.1186/s12913-022-08369-5 [pii] AID - 8369 [pii] AID - 10.1186/s12913-022-08369-5 [doi] PST - epublish SO - BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 4;22(1):994. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08369-5.