PMID- 35980240
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20220822
LR  - 20220822
IS  - 1757-9988 (Electronic)
IS  - 1461-5185 (Linking)
VI  - 24
IP  - 1
DP  - 2022 Aug 18
TI  - Clinical Performance of a "No Wait" Universal Adhesive in Noncarious Cervical 
      Lesions: A Two-year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
PG  - 313-323
LID - 10.3290/j.jad.b3240675 [doi]
AB  - PURPOSE: To evaluate the 24-month clinical performance of a "no wait" universal 
      adhesive with different application modes in comparison with an etch-and-rinsew 
      and two-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). 
      MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 234 non-carious cervical lesions in 34 patients 
      were restored following 5 different adhesive approaches: 1. Clearfil Universal 
      Bond Quick, self-etch mode (CUQ-SE); 2. Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, selective 
      etch mode (CUQ-SLE); 3. Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, etch-and-rinse mode 
      (CUQ-ER); 4. Clearfil SE Bond (self-etch adhesive) (CSEB); 5. Tetric N-Bond 
      Universal, etch-and-rinse mode (TBU-ER). All NCCLs were restored with a 
      nanohybrid composite (Tetric N-Ceram). The restorations were evaluated at 
      baseline, 6, 12, and 24months of clinical service regarding retention, marginal 
      adaptation, marginal discoloration, secondary caries, post-operative sensitivity, 
      color match, surface texture using modified United States Public Health Service 
      (USPHS) criteria. RESULTS: The patient recall rate at 24 months was 73.5%. Eleven 
      restorations, 6 of the CUQ-SE group, 4 of the CSEB group and 1 of the TBU-ER 
      group, were clinically unacceptable due to retention loss. Regarding marginal 
      adaptation and discoloration, CUQ-SE and CSEB groups exhibited higher bravo 
      scores than other groups after 24 months (p < 0.05). At the end of 24-month 
      examinations, no significant differences were detected among the groups regarding 
      secondary caries, post-operative sensitivity, color match and surface texture. 
      CONCLUSION: The clinical survival rates of the "no wait" universal adhesive at 
      self-etch mode after 24 months were not acceptable. The "no wait" universal 
      adhesive showed clinically acceptable performance in selective-etch and 
      etch-and-rinse mode according to the evaluated USPHS criteria.
FAU - Oz, Fatma Dilsad
AU  - Oz FD
FAU - Dursun, Meltem Nermin
AU  - Dursun MN
FAU - Ergin, Esra
AU  - Ergin E
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
PT  - Randomized Controlled Trial
PL  - Germany
TA  - J Adhes Dent
JT  - The journal of adhesive dentistry
JID - 100888552
RN  - 0 (Composite Resins)
RN  - 0 (Dental Cements)
RN  - 0 (Dentin-Bonding Agents)
RN  - 0 (Resin Cements)
MH  - Composite Resins/chemistry
MH  - *Dental Caries
MH  - Dental Cements
MH  - Dental Marginal Adaptation
MH  - Dental Restoration, Permanent
MH  - Dentin-Bonding Agents
MH  - Humans
MH  - Resin Cements
MH  - *Tooth Cervix/pathology
OTO - NOTNLM
OT  - etch-and-rinse.
OT  - non-carious cervical lesions
OT  - self-etch
OT  - universal adhesive
EDAT- 2022/08/19 06:00
MHDA- 2022/08/23 06:00
CRDT- 2022/08/18 09:22
PHST- 2022/08/18 09:22 [entrez]
PHST- 2022/08/19 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2022/08/23 06:00 [medline]
AID - 3240675 [pii]
AID - 10.3290/j.jad.b3240675 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - J Adhes Dent. 2022 Aug 18;24(1):313-323. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b3240675.