PMID- 36070428 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20240205 LR - 20240206 IS - 1708-539X (Electronic) IS - 1708-5381 (Print) IS - 1708-5381 (Linking) VI - 32 IP - 1 DP - 2024 Feb TI - Efficacy analysis following polymer coated drug eluting stent and bare metal stent deployment for femoropopliteal arterial disease. PG - 102-109 LID - 10.1177/17085381221126217 [doi] AB - OBJECTIVES: The objective is to assess the performance of the Eluvia polymer coated drug eluting stent (DES) compared to a bare metal stent (BMS) platform in patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center analysis. Patients treated with the Eluvia DES (group Eluvia) or the EverFlex BMS (group BMS) for femoropopliteal disease between January 2013 and December 2019 were included. Primary measure outcome of this analysis was the overall mortality. The PTX specific mortality, the primary patency, the amputation free survival (AFS), and the target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates were additionally evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients were treated by BMS deployment, while the Eluvia platform was preferred in 75 subjects. In both groups the majority presented with lifestyle limiting claudication (BMS: 84% vs Eluvia: 73%, p = 0.73). Chronic total occlusions were more frequent in patients treated by BMS (BMS: 71% vs Eluvia: 84%, p = 0.027), whereas the calcification burden (BMS: 81% vs Eluvia: 76%, p = 0.43) and the median lesion length (in mm, IQR) (BMS: 160 (100 to 240) vs Eluvia: 140 (80 to 229), p = 0.17) were comparable. At 24 months, the overall survival (BMS: 93% vs Eluvia: 89%, hazard ratio (HR): 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55 to 2.64, p = 0.64) and the PTX specific survival (BMS: 95% vs Eluvia: 95%, HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.41 to 4.02, p = 0.67) did not differ significantly between the two platforms. No significant difference was observed regarding the 24 months primary patency rate (BMS: 66% vs Eluvia: 78%, HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.15, p = 0.18), the freedom from TLR (BMS: 83% vs Eluvia: 89%, HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.68, p = 0.572), and the AFS (BMS: 93 vs Eluvia: 89%, HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.55 to 2.64). The Cox regression analysis revealed a higher mortality risk among patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) (HR: 3.14, 95% CI: 1.61 to 6.14, p = 0.008), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (HR: 4.65, 95% CI: 2.14 to 10.09, p = 0.001), in octagenerians (HR: 4.40, 95% CI: 1.92 to 10.44, p = 0.005), and in patients not on statins at baseline (HR: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.19 to 4.99, p=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, the use of the Eluvia DES did not increase the risk for mortality compared to BMS deployment. CLTI, COPD, advanced age, and the lack of statin therapy at baseline were associated with a higher risk for death. FAU - Shehada, Yousef AU - Shehada Y AD - Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital Muenster, Germany. RINGGOLD: 39612 FAU - Bisdas, Theodosios AU - Bisdas T AD - Department of Vascular Surgery, Athens Medical Center, Athens Greece. RINGGOLD: 69046 FAU - Argyriou, Angeliki AU - Argyriou A AD - Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Augusta Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany. FAU - Torsello, Giovanni AU - Torsello G AD - Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital Muenster, Germany. RINGGOLD: 39612 AD - Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Augusta Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany. FAU - Tsilimparis, Nikolaos AU - Tsilimparis N AD - Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Germany. FAU - Beropoulis, Efthymios AU - Beropoulis E AUID- ORCID: 0000-0003-1338-750X AD - Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital Muenster, Germany. RINGGOLD: 39612 FAU - Stavroulakis, Konstantinos AU - Stavroulakis K AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-9775-9210 AD - Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Germany. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20220907 PL - England TA - Vascular JT - Vascular JID - 101196722 RN - 0 (Polymers) RN - P88XT4IS4D (Paclitaxel) SB - IM MH - Humans MH - Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging MH - Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging MH - *Drug-Eluting Stents MH - Polymers MH - Retrospective Studies MH - Paclitaxel MH - *Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy/drug therapy MH - Vascular Patency MH - Stents MH - *Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive MH - Treatment Outcome PMC - PMC10838477 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Mortality OT - PAD OT - femoropopliteal OT - paclitaxel OT - scaffolds COIS- Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. EDAT- 2022/09/08 06:00 MHDA- 2024/02/05 06:42 PMCR- 2024/02/04 CRDT- 2022/09/07 14:33 PHST- 2024/02/05 06:42 [medline] PHST- 2022/09/08 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2022/09/07 14:33 [entrez] PHST- 2024/02/04 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.1177_17085381221126217 [pii] AID - 10.1177/17085381221126217 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Vascular. 2024 Feb;32(1):102-109. doi: 10.1177/17085381221126217. Epub 2022 Sep 7.