PMID- 36120812
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20221014
LR  - 20230203
IS  - 1473-5628 (Electronic)
IS  - 0143-3636 (Linking)
VI  - 43
IP  - 11
DP  - 2022 Nov 1
TI  - Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of PET and CMR for the measurement of left 
      ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a system review and meta-analysis.
PG  - 1143-1154
LID - 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001612 [doi]
AB  - BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been recognized as the gold 
      standard for the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) function. Cardiac gated PET 
      allows the simultaneous assessment of LV function with the evaluation of 
      myocardial perfusion and metabolism. But the correlations between PET and CMR 
      remain controversial. METHODS: We conducted a systematic electronic search of 
      PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library . Forest plot, spearman correlation 
      analysis and Bland-Altman analysis were used to evaluate the correlations between 
      PET and CMR. RESULTS: Pooled analysis of 13 studies showed that PET 
      underestimated left ventricular end-diastolic volumes (LVEDV) [mean difference 
      (MD), -15.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), -23.10 to -7.50; P  < 0.001] and left 
      ventricular end-systolic volumes (LVESV) (MD, -6.20; 95% CI, -12.58 to 0.17; P 
       = 0.06) but not left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD, -0.35; 95% CI, 
      -1.75 to 1.06; P  = 0.63). Overall, there were very good correlations between PET 
      and CMR measurements for LVEDV ( r , 0.897), LVESV ( r , 0.924) and LVEF ( r , 
      0.898). Subgroup analysis indicated that LVEDV >/=180 ml and LVEF <40% reduced the 
      accuracy of PET, especially the measurement of LVEF ( r , LVEDV >/=180 vs . r , 
      LVEDV < 180 : 0.821 vs. 0.944; r , LVEF < 40% vs . r , LVEF >/=40% : 0.784 vs. 
      0.901). CONCLUSIONS: Correlations between PET and CMR measurements of LVEDV, 
      LVESV and LVEF were excellent, but these two methods could not be used 
      interchangeably for accurate measurements of LV volume and LVEF in patients with 
      significantly increased LV volume and decreased LVEF.
CI  - Copyright (c) 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
FAU - Ye, Yong
AU  - Ye Y
AD  - Department of Radiology, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, China 
      Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, Hubei 
      Province.
FAU - Yang, Ying
AU  - Yang Y
AD  - Department of Cardiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, NO.1, 
      Tsinghua Yuan, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
FAU - Gong, Jie
AU  - Gong J
AD  - Department of Radiology, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, China 
      Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, Hubei 
      Province.
FAU - Shao, Wen-Wen
AU  - Shao WW
AD  - Department of Radiology, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, China 
      Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, Hubei 
      Province.
FAU - Yu, Cheng-Xin
AU  - Yu CX
AD  - Department of Radiology, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, China 
      Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, Hubei 
      Province.
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
PT  - Meta-Analysis
DEP - 20220919
PL  - England
TA  - Nucl Med Commun
JT  - Nuclear medicine communications
JID - 8201017
SB  - IM
MH  - *Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging
MH  - Humans
MH  - Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
MH  - Positron-Emission Tomography/methods
MH  - Stroke Volume
MH  - *Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
MH  - Ventricular Function, Left
EDAT- 2022/09/20 06:00
MHDA- 2022/10/15 06:00
CRDT- 2022/09/19 04:49
PHST- 2022/09/20 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2022/10/15 06:00 [medline]
PHST- 2022/09/19 04:49 [entrez]
AID - 00006231-202211000-00006 [pii]
AID - 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001612 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Nucl Med Commun. 2022 Nov 1;43(11):1143-1154. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001612. 
      Epub 2022 Sep 19.