PMID- 36217531 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20221012 IS - 2468-0249 (Electronic) IS - 2468-0249 (Linking) VI - 7 IP - 10 DP - 2022 Oct TI - Isolated Pre-existing HLA-DP Donor-Specific Antibodies are Associated With Poorer Outcomes in Renal Transplantation. PG - 2251-2263 LID - 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.07.014 [doi] AB - INTRODUCTION: The importance of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in renal transplantation has long been recognized, but the significance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DP antibodies remains less clear. We performed a retrospective single center study of renal transplants with pre-existing isolated HLA-DP-DSAs to assess clinical outcomes. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with isolated HLA-DP-DSAs were compared with 3 control groups as follows: standard immunological risk (calculated reaction frequency [cRF] < 85%, no current or historical DSA, no repeat mismatched antigens with previous transplants, n = 46), highly sensitized (cRF > 85%, n = 27), and patients with HLA-DP antibodies that were not donor-specific (n = 18). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed comparing antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR)-free and graft survival. Factors in the final multivariable models included patient group, % cRF, B-cell flow crossmatch (BFXM) positivity and regrafts. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 1197 days, 65% of HLA-DP-DSA patients had ABMR on indication biopsies, and 30% of HLA-DP-DSA patients lost their graft. Pre-existing HLA-DP DSAs remained the single factor associated with ABMR after multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 9.578, P = 0.012). Patients with HLA-DP DSAs had increased microvascular scores (P = 0.0346) and worse transplant glomerulopathy (P = 0.015) on biopsy compared with the standard immunological risk group. Furthermore, flow crossmatch (FXM) positivity did not help inform on the risk of graft failure or ABMR in patients with preformed DP-DSA. CONCLUSION: Transplants with pre-existing HLA-DP-DSAs should be considered high risk. Routine laboratory tests are unable to further risk stratify these patients. Recipients should be considered for intensified immunosuppression and closely monitored. CI - (c) 2022 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. FAU - Seitz, Adrienne AU - Seitz A AD - Renal Transplant Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. AD - Transplant Immunology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. FAU - Mounsey, Katherine AU - Mounsey K AD - Transplant Immunology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. FAU - Hughes, Pamela AU - Hughes P AD - Transplant Immunology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. FAU - Cullen, Katherine AU - Cullen K AD - Transplant Immunology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. FAU - Welberry Smith, Matthew AU - Welberry Smith M AD - Renal Transplant Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. FAU - Daga, Sunil AU - Daga S AD - Renal Transplant Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. FAU - Carter, Clive AU - Carter C AD - Transplant Immunology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. FAU - Clark, Brendan AU - Clark B AD - Transplant Immunology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. FAU - Baker, Richard AU - Baker R AD - Renal Transplant Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20220803 PL - United States TA - Kidney Int Rep JT - Kidney international reports JID - 101684752 PMC - PMC9546735 OTO - NOTNLM OT - HLA-DP OT - antibody-mediated rejection OT - donor-specific antibodies EDAT- 2022/10/12 06:00 MHDA- 2022/10/12 06:01 PMCR- 2022/08/03 CRDT- 2022/10/11 01:49 PHST- 2021/09/27 00:00 [received] PHST- 2022/07/08 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2022/07/11 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2022/10/11 01:49 [entrez] PHST- 2022/10/12 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2022/10/12 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2022/08/03 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - S2468-0249(22)01513-3 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.07.014 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Kidney Int Rep. 2022 Aug 3;7(10):2251-2263. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.07.014. eCollection 2022 Oct.